Polarization in access to work-related training in Great Britain

Colin Lindsay*, Jesus Canduela, Robert Raeside

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)


    Policy-makers across industrialized nations have sought to increase participation in work-related training as a route to improved competitiveness. However, research conducted in Britain during the 1990s identified significant differences in participation, suggesting that processes of labour market polarization were being played out in unequal access to training. This article updates and builds upon this work through an analysis of British Labour Force Survey data. The analysis sought to assess continuing inequalities in work-related training, comparing the experiences of samples of public and private sector employees, in order to identify evidence of polarized access to skills development opportunities. The study also sought to establish if union representation increased participation and reduced inequalities in access to training. It was found that older workers, the lower skilled and unqualified, part-timers and temporary workers (among others) remained disadvantaged. Trade union presence had powerful positive effects on participation and reduced some inequalities, especially in the private sector.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)205-225
    Number of pages21
    JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2013


    • Employability
    • equal opportunities
    • human capital
    • trade unions
    • training

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Business,Management and Accounting
    • Strategy and Management
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
    • Management of Technology and Innovation


    Dive into the research topics of 'Polarization in access to work-related training in Great Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this