Performance Evaluation of Alternative Jet Fuels using a hybrid MCDA method

Bing Xu, Ben W. Kolosz, John M. Andresen, Jamal Ouenniche, Phil Greening, Tsung-Sheng Chang, M. Mercedes Maroto-Valer

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

1 Citation (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We design a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making analysis (MCDA)-based framework to evaluate competing alternative jet fuels (AJFs). Our analysis on AJFs is based on a wide range of criteria with different forms of data and relations and reflect stakeholders’ view and opinions. This contrast with conventional cost-benefit analysis which typically focuses on the economic benefits at the expense of environmental, technological and social aspects. Our work adds value to understand developing technologies to date, technical barriers to commercialization, other development drivers such as the availability and willingness of financial institutions to finance, businesses to invest in AJFs productions and its supply chains in the UK, policy support and regulation, and likely commercialization and scale-up potentials. By focusing on motives, attitudes and stakeholders rather than merely the technical and economic aspects of AJFs, our paper makes an important contribution to the field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1110-1115
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume158
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
Event10th International Conference on Applied Energy 2018 - Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Duration: 22 Aug 201825 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Alternative jet fuels
  • Analytical Hierarchy Process
  • Gasification and FT Synthesis
  • Multi-criteria decision-making analysis
  • PROMETHEE II
  • Stakeholder analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Performance Evaluation of Alternative Jet Fuels using a hybrid MCDA method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this