Performance Cultures and Doped Bodies: Challenging Categories, Gender Norms, and Policy Responses

Jesper Andreasson, April Henning

Research output: Book/ReportBook


Why has doping, both as a practice and a social phenomenon, been approached largely as a question of context: sport or fitness? Individuals may use substances to enhance sporting performance or within the framework of gym and fitness culture to create a perfect body. But clearly, people who dope are not bound to a singular context. It is quite the opposite, as individuals weave between and move across various settings in their trajectories to and from doping, as goals, identities, ambitions, and lifestyles change over time. Still, these stark categorizations often made in public discourse – and reinforced by scholars – have continued to ignore these lived experiences and limited our understanding of doping. Building on data gathered through ethnographic fieldwork, studies of online doping communities, and in-depth case studies, this book embraces the challenge of moving beyond traditional and historical doping dichotomies – such as those of sport or fitness, online or offline, pleasure or harm, masculinity or femininity, and health or harm – and, in a sociologically informed analysis, it develops new terminology to understand trajectories to and from doping. It argues there are multiple ways to understand doped bodies and doping practices, and that we must approach these questions from the perspective of both/and rather than either/or. By imploding these divisions, it offers updated and nuanced ways of both empirically and theoretically rethinking doping use and experiences attached to the practice.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCommon Ground Research Networks
Number of pages103
ISBN (Electronic)9781863352420
ISBN (Print)9780949313997, 9781863352413
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Performance Cultures and Doped Bodies: Challenging Categories, Gender Norms, and Policy Responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this