Peer review: Does it really help students?

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Student peer review has long been a method for increasing student engagement and work quality. We present notes on teaching tips and techniques using peer review as a means to engage students interest in the area of computer graphics and interactive animation. We address questions, such as, when feedback fails, why students should be 'trained' on feedback, and what constitutes a 'constructive' review. We present a case study around the structure and workings of a module - and its success in encouraging collaborative working, group discussions, public engagement (e.g., through wikis and events), and peer review work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages31-32
Number of pages2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event37th Annual Conference on European Association for Computer Graphics 2016 - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 9 May 201613 May 2016

Conference

Conference37th Annual Conference on European Association for Computer Graphics 2016
Abbreviated titleEUROGRAPHICS 2016
CountryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period9/05/1613/05/16

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Format
  • Graphics
  • Peer review
  • Physics
  • Teaching
  • Technical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Peer review: Does it really help students?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this