Part of the problem or part of the solution? Social housing allocation policies and social exclusion in Britain

Hal Pawson, Keith Kintrea

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article examines claims that social housing allocations policies can, on the one hand, contribute to and on the other, counter, social exclusion. In setting the scene, the paper investigates connections between housing processes and social exclusion and describes the development of social housing allocations systems over the past few decades. Drawing on evidence from two recently completed national studies in England and Scotland it shows that allocation policies contribute to social exclusion in three main ways. First, a large proportion of social landlords restrict eligibility for social housing thereby contributing directly to exclusion. Second, mechanisms within allocation systems continue to segregate the most excluded to the worst residential areas. Third, through the 1990s allocation policies became increasingly coercive, so reducing or eliminating tenant choice over their own housing in distinct contrast to the choice that is available in the private market. The paper then reviews the dilemmas faced by policy-makers: whilst aspects of allocations contribute to social exclusion at the individual level, they may be justified by their role in promoting sustainable residential communities. Although there are hopes that the 'choice-based' approaches to lettings which emerged in the late 1990s can both boost community sustainability and counter the disabling impact of coercive approaches, the article suggests it is unlikely that such methods can significantly enhance social inclusion as long as social housing remains a housing sector of last resort, with inbuilt disadvantages.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)643-667
    Number of pages25
    JournalJournal of Social Policy
    Volume31
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2002

    Fingerprint

    social housing
    exclusion
    housing
    landlord
    residential area
    community
    inclusion
    sustainability
    market
    evidence

    Cite this

    @article{5d75e9ce6940419ebc4a259cadccb662,
    title = "Part of the problem or part of the solution? Social housing allocation policies and social exclusion in Britain",
    abstract = "This article examines claims that social housing allocations policies can, on the one hand, contribute to and on the other, counter, social exclusion. In setting the scene, the paper investigates connections between housing processes and social exclusion and describes the development of social housing allocations systems over the past few decades. Drawing on evidence from two recently completed national studies in England and Scotland it shows that allocation policies contribute to social exclusion in three main ways. First, a large proportion of social landlords restrict eligibility for social housing thereby contributing directly to exclusion. Second, mechanisms within allocation systems continue to segregate the most excluded to the worst residential areas. Third, through the 1990s allocation policies became increasingly coercive, so reducing or eliminating tenant choice over their own housing in distinct contrast to the choice that is available in the private market. The paper then reviews the dilemmas faced by policy-makers: whilst aspects of allocations contribute to social exclusion at the individual level, they may be justified by their role in promoting sustainable residential communities. Although there are hopes that the 'choice-based' approaches to lettings which emerged in the late 1990s can both boost community sustainability and counter the disabling impact of coercive approaches, the article suggests it is unlikely that such methods can significantly enhance social inclusion as long as social housing remains a housing sector of last resort, with inbuilt disadvantages.",
    author = "Hal Pawson and Keith Kintrea",
    year = "2002",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1017/S0047279402006797",
    language = "English",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "643--667",
    journal = "Journal of Social Policy",
    issn = "0047-2794",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    Part of the problem or part of the solution? Social housing allocation policies and social exclusion in Britain. / Pawson, Hal; Kintrea, Keith.

    In: Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 31, No. 4, 10.2002, p. 643-667.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Part of the problem or part of the solution? Social housing allocation policies and social exclusion in Britain

    AU - Pawson, Hal

    AU - Kintrea, Keith

    PY - 2002/10

    Y1 - 2002/10

    N2 - This article examines claims that social housing allocations policies can, on the one hand, contribute to and on the other, counter, social exclusion. In setting the scene, the paper investigates connections between housing processes and social exclusion and describes the development of social housing allocations systems over the past few decades. Drawing on evidence from two recently completed national studies in England and Scotland it shows that allocation policies contribute to social exclusion in three main ways. First, a large proportion of social landlords restrict eligibility for social housing thereby contributing directly to exclusion. Second, mechanisms within allocation systems continue to segregate the most excluded to the worst residential areas. Third, through the 1990s allocation policies became increasingly coercive, so reducing or eliminating tenant choice over their own housing in distinct contrast to the choice that is available in the private market. The paper then reviews the dilemmas faced by policy-makers: whilst aspects of allocations contribute to social exclusion at the individual level, they may be justified by their role in promoting sustainable residential communities. Although there are hopes that the 'choice-based' approaches to lettings which emerged in the late 1990s can both boost community sustainability and counter the disabling impact of coercive approaches, the article suggests it is unlikely that such methods can significantly enhance social inclusion as long as social housing remains a housing sector of last resort, with inbuilt disadvantages.

    AB - This article examines claims that social housing allocations policies can, on the one hand, contribute to and on the other, counter, social exclusion. In setting the scene, the paper investigates connections between housing processes and social exclusion and describes the development of social housing allocations systems over the past few decades. Drawing on evidence from two recently completed national studies in England and Scotland it shows that allocation policies contribute to social exclusion in three main ways. First, a large proportion of social landlords restrict eligibility for social housing thereby contributing directly to exclusion. Second, mechanisms within allocation systems continue to segregate the most excluded to the worst residential areas. Third, through the 1990s allocation policies became increasingly coercive, so reducing or eliminating tenant choice over their own housing in distinct contrast to the choice that is available in the private market. The paper then reviews the dilemmas faced by policy-makers: whilst aspects of allocations contribute to social exclusion at the individual level, they may be justified by their role in promoting sustainable residential communities. Although there are hopes that the 'choice-based' approaches to lettings which emerged in the late 1990s can both boost community sustainability and counter the disabling impact of coercive approaches, the article suggests it is unlikely that such methods can significantly enhance social inclusion as long as social housing remains a housing sector of last resort, with inbuilt disadvantages.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036772319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0047279402006797

    DO - 10.1017/S0047279402006797

    M3 - Article

    VL - 31

    SP - 643

    EP - 667

    JO - Journal of Social Policy

    JF - Journal of Social Policy

    SN - 0047-2794

    IS - 4

    ER -