Abstract
We find that in the leveraged loan sector, firms borrowing from non-banks have lower profitability following loan originations, compared to firms borrowing from banks, after controlling for observable factors. As non-bank borrowers experience less intense monitoring than bank borrowers, they engage in more risk-taking, which could explain their lower profitability following loan issuance. Using the leveraged lending guidance as a plausibly exogenous shock, which resulted in the migration of borrowers from banks to non-banks, we provide causal evidence corroborating our main results. Overall, our findings suggest that macroprudential policies which exclusively target the traditional banking sector may have negative consequences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 107561 |
| Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
| Volume | 181 |
| Early online date | 28 Sept 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2025 |
Keywords
- G21
- G23
- G30
- Leveraged lending guidance
- Monitoring
- Non-bank lending
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Non-bank Lending and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Syndicate Loan Market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver