TY - JOUR
T1 - Nature-Based Solutions or Debacles? The Politics of Reflexive Governance for Sustainable and Just Cities
AU - van der Jagt, Alexander P. N.
AU - Kiss, Bernadett
AU - Hirose, Shunsuke
AU - Takahashi, Wakana
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Helen Toxopeus, Hens Runhaar, Attila Katona, and Natalie Gulsrud, along with two reviewers, for their reflections and feedback on previous versions of this paper. We are also grateful to colleagues in the NATURVATION project for supporting the development of the case study protocol and contributing to the data collection. Funding. This research has been funded by the European Commission's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 730243, together with participating partners in the NATURVATION project and the International Research Fellowship Program of the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science.
Funding Information:
The municipality has to some extent flexibly responded to the requests made by the garden’s coordinator for financial support. In recent years, structural funding has been provided through a fixed annual subsidy to support the social care function of the garden. In addition, the Work and Income Department is funding skill development activities for unemployed people provided by Food for Good on a per-client basis. This was only made possible after national government devolved responsibilities for social care, youth welfare, and occupational reintegration to municipalities, while also deinstitutionalizing the market, creating an opening for smaller-scale organizations like Food for Good to offer paid services in these domains. Food for Good’s funding arrangement with cofunding by the social domain of the municipality for an urban NBSs provides a unique setup within the city.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 van der Jagt, Kiss, Hirose and Takahashi.
PY - 2021/1/21
Y1 - 2021/1/21
N2 - With their potential to effectively address multiple urban sustainability challenges, the emerging policy discourse on nature-based solutions seeks to encourage the development of multifunctional nature for sustainable and just cities. Nature-based solutions, however, are vulnerable to co-option by powerful interests in ways that limit their contribution to a broad range of sustainability goals. Reflexive governance arrangements between different types of actors, engaging in continuous and iterative processes of learning and readjustment of institutions and practices, provide a way to address this issue. However, the potential of reflexive governance in increasing commitment to sustainable and just cities, and the role of power struggles in such processes, remains underexplored. To study this question, we undertake a comparative case study analysis of nature-based solutions in Utrecht (The Netherlands), Malmö (Sweden), and Utsunomiya (Japan). These are analyzed using a framework structured around the dimensions of system analysis, goal formulation, and strategy implementation, to which we apply a justice lens. The findings demonstrate reflexive processes in each of the studied cases, but the justice dimension is not always explicitly taken into account or clearly influenced in positive ways. We unveil tensions between the ideal of sustainable and just cities and the reality of urban nature-based solution initiatives being partially dependent on the power structures they seek to influence for their continued existence. We argue against dismissing the studied cases as neoliberal projects on these grounds. Reflexive governance for sustainable and just cities entails a continuous struggle for dominance between different ideas and interests. Moreover, the battlegrounds for these struggles may look very different across sociopolitical contexts. Provided that justice considerations are continually present, reflexive governance of urban nature-based solutions is likely to contribute to more sustainable and just cities.
AB - With their potential to effectively address multiple urban sustainability challenges, the emerging policy discourse on nature-based solutions seeks to encourage the development of multifunctional nature for sustainable and just cities. Nature-based solutions, however, are vulnerable to co-option by powerful interests in ways that limit their contribution to a broad range of sustainability goals. Reflexive governance arrangements between different types of actors, engaging in continuous and iterative processes of learning and readjustment of institutions and practices, provide a way to address this issue. However, the potential of reflexive governance in increasing commitment to sustainable and just cities, and the role of power struggles in such processes, remains underexplored. To study this question, we undertake a comparative case study analysis of nature-based solutions in Utrecht (The Netherlands), Malmö (Sweden), and Utsunomiya (Japan). These are analyzed using a framework structured around the dimensions of system analysis, goal formulation, and strategy implementation, to which we apply a justice lens. The findings demonstrate reflexive processes in each of the studied cases, but the justice dimension is not always explicitly taken into account or clearly influenced in positive ways. We unveil tensions between the ideal of sustainable and just cities and the reality of urban nature-based solution initiatives being partially dependent on the power structures they seek to influence for their continued existence. We argue against dismissing the studied cases as neoliberal projects on these grounds. Reflexive governance for sustainable and just cities entails a continuous struggle for dominance between different ideas and interests. Moreover, the battlegrounds for these struggles may look very different across sociopolitical contexts. Provided that justice considerations are continually present, reflexive governance of urban nature-based solutions is likely to contribute to more sustainable and just cities.
KW - adaptive management
KW - environmental justice
KW - mosaic governance
KW - nature-based solutions
KW - reflexive governance
KW - sustainable cities
KW - urban greening
KW - urban transformation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123067792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/frsc.2020.583833
DO - 10.3389/frsc.2020.583833
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123067792
SN - 2624-9634
VL - 2
JO - Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
JF - Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
M1 - 583833
ER -