Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making

Hilary Godwin; Catherine Nameth; David Avery; Lynn L. Bergeson; Daniel Bernard; Elizabeth Beryt; William Boyes; Scott Brown; Amy J. Clippinger; Yoram Cohen; Maria Doa; Christine Ogilvie Hendren; Patricia Holden; Keith Houck; Agnes B. Kane; Frederick Klaessig; Toivo Kodas; Robert Landsiedel; Iseult Lynch; Timothy Malloy; Mary Beth Miller; Julie Muller; Gunter Oberdorster; Elijah J. Petersen; Richard C. Pleus; Philip Sayre; Vicki Stone; Kristie M. Sullivan; Jutta Tentschert; Philip Wallis; Andre E. Nel

doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b00941

Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making

Hilary Godwin^*, Catherine Nameth, David Avery, Lynn L. Bergeson, Daniel Bernard, Elizabeth Beryt, William Boyes, Scott Brown, Amy J. Clippinger, Yoram Cohen, Maria Doa, Christine Ogilvie Hendren, Patricia Holden, Keith Houck, Agnes B. Kane, Frederick Klaessig, Toivo Kodas, Robert Landsiedel, Iseult Lynch, Timothy MalloyMary Beth Miller, Julie Muller, Gunter Oberdorster, Elijah J. Petersen, Richard C. Pleus, Philip Sayre, Vicki Stone, Kristie M. Sullivan, Jutta Tentschert, Philip Wallis, Andre E. Nel

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For nanotechnology to meet its potential as a game-changing and sustainable technology, it is important to ensure that the engineered nanomaterials and nanoenabled products that gain entry to the marketplace are safe and effective. Tools and methods are needed for regulatory purposes to allow rapid material categorization according to human health and environmental risk potential, so that materials of high concern can be targeted for additional scrutiny, while material categories that pose the least risk can receive expedited review. Using carbon nanotubes as an example, we discuss how data from alternative testing strategies can be used to facilitate engineered nanomaterial categorization according to risk potential and how such an approach could facilitate regulatory decision-making in the future.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3409-3417
Number of pages	9
Journal	ACS Nano
Volume	9
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00941
Publication status	Published - 28 Apr 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Engineering
General Materials Science
General Physics and Astronomy

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1021/acsnano.5b00941

Cite this

Godwin, H., Nameth, C., Avery, D., Bergeson, L. L., Bernard, D., Beryt, E., Boyes, W., Brown, S., Clippinger, A. J., Cohen, Y., Doa, M., Hendren, C. O., Holden, P., Houck, K., Kane, A. B., Klaessig, F., Kodas, T., Landsiedel, R., Lynch, I., ... Nel, A. E. (2015). Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making. ACS Nano, 9(4), 3409-3417. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00941

@article{22118042f4644a3bbd071da7804a637d,

title = "Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making",

abstract = "For nanotechnology to meet its potential as a game-changing and sustainable technology, it is important to ensure that the engineered nanomaterials and nanoenabled products that gain entry to the marketplace are safe and effective. Tools and methods are needed for regulatory purposes to allow rapid material categorization according to human health and environmental risk potential, so that materials of high concern can be targeted for additional scrutiny, while material categories that pose the least risk can receive expedited review. Using carbon nanotubes as an example, we discuss how data from alternative testing strategies can be used to facilitate engineered nanomaterial categorization according to risk potential and how such an approach could facilitate regulatory decision-making in the future.",

author = "Hilary Godwin and Catherine Nameth and David Avery and Bergeson, {Lynn L.} and Daniel Bernard and Elizabeth Beryt and William Boyes and Scott Brown and Clippinger, {Amy J.} and Yoram Cohen and Maria Doa and Hendren, {Christine Ogilvie} and Patricia Holden and Keith Houck and Kane, {Agnes B.} and Frederick Klaessig and Toivo Kodas and Robert Landsiedel and Iseult Lynch and Timothy Malloy and Miller, {Mary Beth} and Julie Muller and Gunter Oberdorster and Petersen, {Elijah J.} and Pleus, {Richard C.} and Philip Sayre and Vicki Stone and Sullivan, {Kristie M.} and Jutta Tentschert and Philip Wallis and Nel, {Andre E.}",

year = "2015",

month = apr,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1021/acsnano.5b00941",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "3409--3417",

journal = "ACS Nano",

issn = "1936-0851",

publisher = "American Chemical Society",

number = "4",

}

Godwin, H, Nameth, C, Avery, D, Bergeson, LL, Bernard, D, Beryt, E, Boyes, W, Brown, S, Clippinger, AJ, Cohen, Y, Doa, M, Hendren, CO, Holden, P, Houck, K, Kane, AB, Klaessig, F, Kodas, T, Landsiedel, R, Lynch, I, Malloy, T, Miller, MB, Muller, J, Oberdorster, G, Petersen, EJ, Pleus, RC, Sayre, P, Stone, V, Sullivan, KM, Tentschert, J, Wallis, P & Nel, AE 2015, 'Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making', ACS Nano, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3409-3417. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00941

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making

AU - Godwin, Hilary

AU - Nameth, Catherine

AU - Avery, David

AU - Bergeson, Lynn L.

AU - Bernard, Daniel

AU - Beryt, Elizabeth

AU - Boyes, William

AU - Brown, Scott

AU - Clippinger, Amy J.

AU - Cohen, Yoram

AU - Doa, Maria

AU - Hendren, Christine Ogilvie

AU - Holden, Patricia

AU - Houck, Keith

AU - Kane, Agnes B.

AU - Klaessig, Frederick

AU - Kodas, Toivo

AU - Landsiedel, Robert

AU - Lynch, Iseult

AU - Malloy, Timothy

AU - Miller, Mary Beth

AU - Muller, Julie

AU - Oberdorster, Gunter

AU - Petersen, Elijah J.

AU - Pleus, Richard C.

AU - Sayre, Philip

AU - Stone, Vicki

AU - Sullivan, Kristie M.

AU - Tentschert, Jutta

AU - Wallis, Philip

AU - Nel, Andre E.

PY - 2015/4/28

Y1 - 2015/4/28

N2 - For nanotechnology to meet its potential as a game-changing and sustainable technology, it is important to ensure that the engineered nanomaterials and nanoenabled products that gain entry to the marketplace are safe and effective. Tools and methods are needed for regulatory purposes to allow rapid material categorization according to human health and environmental risk potential, so that materials of high concern can be targeted for additional scrutiny, while material categories that pose the least risk can receive expedited review. Using carbon nanotubes as an example, we discuss how data from alternative testing strategies can be used to facilitate engineered nanomaterial categorization according to risk potential and how such an approach could facilitate regulatory decision-making in the future.

AB - For nanotechnology to meet its potential as a game-changing and sustainable technology, it is important to ensure that the engineered nanomaterials and nanoenabled products that gain entry to the marketplace are safe and effective. Tools and methods are needed for regulatory purposes to allow rapid material categorization according to human health and environmental risk potential, so that materials of high concern can be targeted for additional scrutiny, while material categories that pose the least risk can receive expedited review. Using carbon nanotubes as an example, we discuss how data from alternative testing strategies can be used to facilitate engineered nanomaterial categorization according to risk potential and how such an approach could facilitate regulatory decision-making in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928810229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acsnano.5b00941

DO - 10.1021/acsnano.5b00941

M3 - Article

C2 - 25791861

AN - SCOPUS:84928810229

SN - 1936-0851

VL - 9

SP - 3409

EP - 3417

JO - ACS Nano

JF - ACS Nano

IS - 4

ER -

Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this