Multiple exclusion homelessness in the UK: key patterns and intersections

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article presents preliminary results from a multi-stage quantitative study of ‘multiple exclusion homelessness’ (MEH) in seven urban locations across the UK. It demonstrates a very high degree of overlap between a range of experiences associated with ‘deep social exclusion’ – namely, homelessness, substance misuse, institutional care and ‘street culture’ activities (such as begging and street drinking). It also provides evidence to support the contention that homelessness is a particularly prevalent form of exclusion, with its experience reported as widespread by those accessing low threshold support services targeted at other dimensions of deep exclusion, such as drug misuse. Further, the analysis presented indicates that the nature of MEH varies geographically, with the profile of the population affected looking quite different in Westminster (London) than in the other urban locations. The main explanation for this appears to be the exceptionally high proportion of migrants in the MEH population in Westminster, who tend to report lower overall levels of personal trauma and vulnerability than the indigenous MEH population.
LanguageEnglish
Pages501-512
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Policy and Society
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

homelessness
exclusion
trauma
experience
vulnerability
migrant
drug
evidence

Cite this

@article{3c779012b4fe4ceab3d892010b4cc14c,
title = "Multiple exclusion homelessness in the UK: key patterns and intersections",
abstract = "This article presents preliminary results from a multi-stage quantitative study of ‘multiple exclusion homelessness’ (MEH) in seven urban locations across the UK. It demonstrates a very high degree of overlap between a range of experiences associated with ‘deep social exclusion’ – namely, homelessness, substance misuse, institutional care and ‘street culture’ activities (such as begging and street drinking). It also provides evidence to support the contention that homelessness is a particularly prevalent form of exclusion, with its experience reported as widespread by those accessing low threshold support services targeted at other dimensions of deep exclusion, such as drug misuse. Further, the analysis presented indicates that the nature of MEH varies geographically, with the profile of the population affected looking quite different in Westminster (London) than in the other urban locations. The main explanation for this appears to be the exceptionally high proportion of migrants in the MEH population in Westminster, who tend to report lower overall levels of personal trauma and vulnerability than the indigenous MEH population.",
author = "Suzanne Fitzpatrick and Sarah Johnsen and Michael White",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1017/S147474641100025X",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "501--512",
journal = "Social Policy and Society",
issn = "1474-7464",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Multiple exclusion homelessness in the UK: key patterns and intersections. / Fitzpatrick, Suzanne; Johnsen, Sarah; White, Michael.

In: Social Policy and Society, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2011, p. 501-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple exclusion homelessness in the UK: key patterns and intersections

AU - Fitzpatrick, Suzanne

AU - Johnsen, Sarah

AU - White, Michael

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article presents preliminary results from a multi-stage quantitative study of ‘multiple exclusion homelessness’ (MEH) in seven urban locations across the UK. It demonstrates a very high degree of overlap between a range of experiences associated with ‘deep social exclusion’ – namely, homelessness, substance misuse, institutional care and ‘street culture’ activities (such as begging and street drinking). It also provides evidence to support the contention that homelessness is a particularly prevalent form of exclusion, with its experience reported as widespread by those accessing low threshold support services targeted at other dimensions of deep exclusion, such as drug misuse. Further, the analysis presented indicates that the nature of MEH varies geographically, with the profile of the population affected looking quite different in Westminster (London) than in the other urban locations. The main explanation for this appears to be the exceptionally high proportion of migrants in the MEH population in Westminster, who tend to report lower overall levels of personal trauma and vulnerability than the indigenous MEH population.

AB - This article presents preliminary results from a multi-stage quantitative study of ‘multiple exclusion homelessness’ (MEH) in seven urban locations across the UK. It demonstrates a very high degree of overlap between a range of experiences associated with ‘deep social exclusion’ – namely, homelessness, substance misuse, institutional care and ‘street culture’ activities (such as begging and street drinking). It also provides evidence to support the contention that homelessness is a particularly prevalent form of exclusion, with its experience reported as widespread by those accessing low threshold support services targeted at other dimensions of deep exclusion, such as drug misuse. Further, the analysis presented indicates that the nature of MEH varies geographically, with the profile of the population affected looking quite different in Westminster (London) than in the other urban locations. The main explanation for this appears to be the exceptionally high proportion of migrants in the MEH population in Westminster, who tend to report lower overall levels of personal trauma and vulnerability than the indigenous MEH population.

U2 - 10.1017/S147474641100025X

DO - 10.1017/S147474641100025X

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 501

EP - 512

JO - Social Policy and Society

T2 - Social Policy and Society

JF - Social Policy and Society

SN - 1474-7464

IS - 4

ER -