Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The advent of high resolution microscopy has increased the scientific community understanding on the heterogeneity of mudrock. There are numerous ongoing efforts to understand micro to nanometer scale pore and pore network in shale which is related to the microstructure. Despite the wide interest in understanding the micro-nano meter scale features in shales, previous microstructural studies have been restricted to small parts of the sample which may not be representative of the whole sample. The best past practice has been to produce manual mosaic images involving combination of images with about 25% overlap. Here we present our preliminary results from a number of polished thin sections of muddy contourites from IODP expedition 317. Mosaics up to several thousand of tiles in size were automatically collected and stitched, using high resolution scanning electron microscope, with tile overlap of approximately 10%. The result shows variation in microfabric and dissimilar orientations within the same slide. Hence, understanding the microstructural characteristics of mudrock over wide mosaic tiles as shown in this study is important to reveal their heterogeneity and constraint critical evaluation of their physical properties.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publication5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential
PublisherEAGE Publishing BV
Pages99-103
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781510822887
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 May 2016
Event5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential - Catania, Italy
Duration: 2 May 20164 May 2016

Conference

Conference5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential
CountryItaly
CityCatania
Period2/05/164/05/16

Fingerprint

tiles
mudstone
microstructure
contourite
porosity
expeditions
shales
high resolution
thin section
chutes
microscopy
shale
physical property
electron microscopes
physical properties
electron
scanning
evaluation
mosaic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics

Cite this

Bankole, S. A., Stow, D. A. V., Lever, H., & Buckman, J. (2016). Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample. In 5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential (pp. 99-103). EAGE Publishing BV. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201600410
Bankole, S. A. ; Stow, D. A. V. ; Lever, Helen ; Buckman, Jim. / Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample. 5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential. EAGE Publishing BV, 2016. pp. 99-103
@inproceedings{96b3f9de2ab841579d3d6916026f389b,
title = "Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample",
abstract = "The advent of high resolution microscopy has increased the scientific community understanding on the heterogeneity of mudrock. There are numerous ongoing efforts to understand micro to nanometer scale pore and pore network in shale which is related to the microstructure. Despite the wide interest in understanding the micro-nano meter scale features in shales, previous microstructural studies have been restricted to small parts of the sample which may not be representative of the whole sample. The best past practice has been to produce manual mosaic images involving combination of images with about 25{\%} overlap. Here we present our preliminary results from a number of polished thin sections of muddy contourites from IODP expedition 317. Mosaics up to several thousand of tiles in size were automatically collected and stitched, using high resolution scanning electron microscope, with tile overlap of approximately 10{\%}. The result shows variation in microfabric and dissimilar orientations within the same slide. Hence, understanding the microstructural characteristics of mudrock over wide mosaic tiles as shown in this study is important to reveal their heterogeneity and constraint critical evaluation of their physical properties.",
author = "Bankole, {S. A.} and Stow, {D. A. V.} and Helen Lever and Jim Buckman",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3997/2214-4609.201600410",
language = "English",
pages = "99--103",
booktitle = "5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential",
publisher = "EAGE Publishing BV",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Bankole, SA, Stow, DAV, Lever, H & Buckman, J 2016, Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample. in 5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential. EAGE Publishing BV, pp. 99-103, 5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential, Catania, Italy, 2/05/16. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201600410

Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample. / Bankole, S. A.; Stow, D. A. V.; Lever, Helen; Buckman, Jim.

5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential. EAGE Publishing BV, 2016. p. 99-103.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample

AU - Bankole, S. A.

AU - Stow, D. A. V.

AU - Lever, Helen

AU - Buckman, Jim

PY - 2016/5/2

Y1 - 2016/5/2

N2 - The advent of high resolution microscopy has increased the scientific community understanding on the heterogeneity of mudrock. There are numerous ongoing efforts to understand micro to nanometer scale pore and pore network in shale which is related to the microstructure. Despite the wide interest in understanding the micro-nano meter scale features in shales, previous microstructural studies have been restricted to small parts of the sample which may not be representative of the whole sample. The best past practice has been to produce manual mosaic images involving combination of images with about 25% overlap. Here we present our preliminary results from a number of polished thin sections of muddy contourites from IODP expedition 317. Mosaics up to several thousand of tiles in size were automatically collected and stitched, using high resolution scanning electron microscope, with tile overlap of approximately 10%. The result shows variation in microfabric and dissimilar orientations within the same slide. Hence, understanding the microstructural characteristics of mudrock over wide mosaic tiles as shown in this study is important to reveal their heterogeneity and constraint critical evaluation of their physical properties.

AB - The advent of high resolution microscopy has increased the scientific community understanding on the heterogeneity of mudrock. There are numerous ongoing efforts to understand micro to nanometer scale pore and pore network in shale which is related to the microstructure. Despite the wide interest in understanding the micro-nano meter scale features in shales, previous microstructural studies have been restricted to small parts of the sample which may not be representative of the whole sample. The best past practice has been to produce manual mosaic images involving combination of images with about 25% overlap. Here we present our preliminary results from a number of polished thin sections of muddy contourites from IODP expedition 317. Mosaics up to several thousand of tiles in size were automatically collected and stitched, using high resolution scanning electron microscope, with tile overlap of approximately 10%. The result shows variation in microfabric and dissimilar orientations within the same slide. Hence, understanding the microstructural characteristics of mudrock over wide mosaic tiles as shown in this study is important to reveal their heterogeneity and constraint critical evaluation of their physical properties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973176770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3997/2214-4609.201600410

DO - 10.3997/2214-4609.201600410

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 99

EP - 103

BT - 5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential

PB - EAGE Publishing BV

ER -

Bankole SA, Stow DAV, Lever H, Buckman J. Microstructure of mudrock and the choice of representative sample. In 5th EAGE Shale Workshop: Quantifying Risks and Potential. EAGE Publishing BV. 2016. p. 99-103 https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201600410