Abstract
To many people, the terms nature-inspired algorithm and metaheuristic are interchangeable. However, this contemporary usage is not consistent with the original meaning of the term metaheuristic, which referred to something closer to a design pattern than to an algorithm. In this paper, it is argued that the loss of focus on true metaheuristics is a primary reason behind the explosion of "novel" nature-inspired algorithms and the issues this has raised. To address this, this paper attempts to explicitly identify the metaheuristics that are used in conventional optimisation algorithms, discuss whether more recent nature-inspired algorithms have delivered any fundamental new knowledge to the field of metaheuristics, and suggest some guidelines for future research in this field.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | GECCO 2014 - Companion Publication of the 2014 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Pages | 1419-1422 |
Number of pages | 4 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781450328814 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Event | 16th Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2014 - Vancouver, Canada Duration: 12 Jul 2014 → 16 Jul 2014 |
Conference
Conference | 16th Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2014 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | GECCO 2014 |
Country/Territory | Canada |
City | Vancouver |
Period | 12/07/14 → 16/07/14 |
Keywords
- Design patterns
- Metaheuristics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Applied Mathematics