Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task

A review literature

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The concept of human mental workload in the field of human factors and psychology has a long history with important applications in the aviation and automotive industries. The main objectives of this literature review are defined the ‘mental workload’ term and determined mental workload measurement methods in driving task. Mental Workload is a complex concept and it is difficult to define this term. It has no a universal accepted definition. Mental workload level cannot be detected directly, however, it has found that relates to limitation of individual internal resources to accomplish the task, and also involves a multi-dimensional variable. Previously, several studies have been indicated that mental workload relate with operators’ performance, task demand and mental resource supply. Extremes (underload or overload) mental workload can degrade operators’ performance. Several assessment methods have been proposed for investigating mental workload. They can be performed in experimental or operational settings. There are seven selection criteria to select the most appropriate methods. These include sensitivity, diagnosticity, intrusiveness, implementation requirement, operator acceptance, selectivity and bandwidth and reliability. Dozens of Mental workload measurement techniques have been developed and categorized into three main groups. (i) Subjective rating, which were categorized into unidimensional and multidimensional. NASA-TLX, SWAT, RSME and MCH are the famous examples of subjective-based techniques. (ii) Performance measures are divided into primary task and secondary task measures. Primary task measures are capable of discriminating the resource competition between individual differences. For example, speed instability, distance headway instability, lateral position from road centerline, lane excursion, time spent out of lane can be widely used to represent the driver primary performances. In secondary task measures are more diagnosticity than primary task measures and subjective measures. Correct response, time response of additional secondary task are a well-known examples of secondary task performance measures in driving research. Additionally, (iii) Physiological techniques also have high sensitivity in measurement, but results from these methods can easily are confounded by other external and extraneous interference. Measures of Eye Functions have been frequently used if compared with other Physiological techniques. It can be argued that the combined methods are recommend cooperatively to predict human mental workload.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association
Subtitle of host publicationIEA 2018
EditorsYushi Fujita, Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander
PublisherSpringer
Pages286-294
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9783319960746
ISBN (Print)9783319960739
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association 2018 - Florence, Italy
Duration: 26 Aug 201830 Aug 2018

Publication series

NameAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
PublisherSpringer
Volume823
ISSN (Print)2194-5357
ISSN (Electronic)2194-5365

Conference

Conference20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association 2018
Abbreviated titleIEA 2018
CountryItaly
CityFlorence
Period26/08/1830/08/18

Fingerprint

Human engineering
Automotive industry
Aviation
NASA
History
Bandwidth

Keywords

  • Driving task
  • Mental workload measurements
  • Performance measurements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Butmee, T., Lansdown, T. C., & Walker, G. H. (2019). Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task: A review literature. In Y. Fujita, S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, & T. Alexander (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association: IEA 2018 (pp. 286-294). (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 823). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_31
Butmee, Totsapon ; Lansdown, Terry C. ; Walker, Guy H. / Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task : A review literature. Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association: IEA 2018. editor / Yushi Fujita ; Sebastiano Bagnara ; Riccardo Tartaglia ; Sara Albolino ; Thomas Alexander. Springer, 2019. pp. 286-294 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing).
@inproceedings{711657852782468390265878cf9272ed,
title = "Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task: A review literature",
abstract = "The concept of human mental workload in the field of human factors and psychology has a long history with important applications in the aviation and automotive industries. The main objectives of this literature review are defined the ‘mental workload’ term and determined mental workload measurement methods in driving task. Mental Workload is a complex concept and it is difficult to define this term. It has no a universal accepted definition. Mental workload level cannot be detected directly, however, it has found that relates to limitation of individual internal resources to accomplish the task, and also involves a multi-dimensional variable. Previously, several studies have been indicated that mental workload relate with operators’ performance, task demand and mental resource supply. Extremes (underload or overload) mental workload can degrade operators’ performance. Several assessment methods have been proposed for investigating mental workload. They can be performed in experimental or operational settings. There are seven selection criteria to select the most appropriate methods. These include sensitivity, diagnosticity, intrusiveness, implementation requirement, operator acceptance, selectivity and bandwidth and reliability. Dozens of Mental workload measurement techniques have been developed and categorized into three main groups. (i) Subjective rating, which were categorized into unidimensional and multidimensional. NASA-TLX, SWAT, RSME and MCH are the famous examples of subjective-based techniques. (ii) Performance measures are divided into primary task and secondary task measures. Primary task measures are capable of discriminating the resource competition between individual differences. For example, speed instability, distance headway instability, lateral position from road centerline, lane excursion, time spent out of lane can be widely used to represent the driver primary performances. In secondary task measures are more diagnosticity than primary task measures and subjective measures. Correct response, time response of additional secondary task are a well-known examples of secondary task performance measures in driving research. Additionally, (iii) Physiological techniques also have high sensitivity in measurement, but results from these methods can easily are confounded by other external and extraneous interference. Measures of Eye Functions have been frequently used if compared with other Physiological techniques. It can be argued that the combined methods are recommend cooperatively to predict human mental workload.",
keywords = "Driving task, Mental workload measurements, Performance measurements",
author = "Totsapon Butmee and Lansdown, {Terry C.} and Walker, {Guy H.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_31",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319960739",
series = "Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "286--294",
editor = "Yushi Fujita and Sebastiano Bagnara and Riccardo Tartaglia and Sara Albolino and Thomas Alexander",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association",

}

Butmee, T, Lansdown, TC & Walker, GH 2019, Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task: A review literature. in Y Fujita, S Bagnara, R Tartaglia, S Albolino & T Alexander (eds), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association: IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 823, Springer, pp. 286-294, 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association 2018, Florence, Italy, 26/08/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_31

Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task : A review literature. / Butmee, Totsapon; Lansdown, Terry C.; Walker, Guy H.

Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association: IEA 2018. ed. / Yushi Fujita; Sebastiano Bagnara; Riccardo Tartaglia; Sara Albolino; Thomas Alexander. Springer, 2019. p. 286-294 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 823).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task

T2 - A review literature

AU - Butmee, Totsapon

AU - Lansdown, Terry C.

AU - Walker, Guy H.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The concept of human mental workload in the field of human factors and psychology has a long history with important applications in the aviation and automotive industries. The main objectives of this literature review are defined the ‘mental workload’ term and determined mental workload measurement methods in driving task. Mental Workload is a complex concept and it is difficult to define this term. It has no a universal accepted definition. Mental workload level cannot be detected directly, however, it has found that relates to limitation of individual internal resources to accomplish the task, and also involves a multi-dimensional variable. Previously, several studies have been indicated that mental workload relate with operators’ performance, task demand and mental resource supply. Extremes (underload or overload) mental workload can degrade operators’ performance. Several assessment methods have been proposed for investigating mental workload. They can be performed in experimental or operational settings. There are seven selection criteria to select the most appropriate methods. These include sensitivity, diagnosticity, intrusiveness, implementation requirement, operator acceptance, selectivity and bandwidth and reliability. Dozens of Mental workload measurement techniques have been developed and categorized into three main groups. (i) Subjective rating, which were categorized into unidimensional and multidimensional. NASA-TLX, SWAT, RSME and MCH are the famous examples of subjective-based techniques. (ii) Performance measures are divided into primary task and secondary task measures. Primary task measures are capable of discriminating the resource competition between individual differences. For example, speed instability, distance headway instability, lateral position from road centerline, lane excursion, time spent out of lane can be widely used to represent the driver primary performances. In secondary task measures are more diagnosticity than primary task measures and subjective measures. Correct response, time response of additional secondary task are a well-known examples of secondary task performance measures in driving research. Additionally, (iii) Physiological techniques also have high sensitivity in measurement, but results from these methods can easily are confounded by other external and extraneous interference. Measures of Eye Functions have been frequently used if compared with other Physiological techniques. It can be argued that the combined methods are recommend cooperatively to predict human mental workload.

AB - The concept of human mental workload in the field of human factors and psychology has a long history with important applications in the aviation and automotive industries. The main objectives of this literature review are defined the ‘mental workload’ term and determined mental workload measurement methods in driving task. Mental Workload is a complex concept and it is difficult to define this term. It has no a universal accepted definition. Mental workload level cannot be detected directly, however, it has found that relates to limitation of individual internal resources to accomplish the task, and also involves a multi-dimensional variable. Previously, several studies have been indicated that mental workload relate with operators’ performance, task demand and mental resource supply. Extremes (underload or overload) mental workload can degrade operators’ performance. Several assessment methods have been proposed for investigating mental workload. They can be performed in experimental or operational settings. There are seven selection criteria to select the most appropriate methods. These include sensitivity, diagnosticity, intrusiveness, implementation requirement, operator acceptance, selectivity and bandwidth and reliability. Dozens of Mental workload measurement techniques have been developed and categorized into three main groups. (i) Subjective rating, which were categorized into unidimensional and multidimensional. NASA-TLX, SWAT, RSME and MCH are the famous examples of subjective-based techniques. (ii) Performance measures are divided into primary task and secondary task measures. Primary task measures are capable of discriminating the resource competition between individual differences. For example, speed instability, distance headway instability, lateral position from road centerline, lane excursion, time spent out of lane can be widely used to represent the driver primary performances. In secondary task measures are more diagnosticity than primary task measures and subjective measures. Correct response, time response of additional secondary task are a well-known examples of secondary task performance measures in driving research. Additionally, (iii) Physiological techniques also have high sensitivity in measurement, but results from these methods can easily are confounded by other external and extraneous interference. Measures of Eye Functions have been frequently used if compared with other Physiological techniques. It can be argued that the combined methods are recommend cooperatively to predict human mental workload.

KW - Driving task

KW - Mental workload measurements

KW - Performance measurements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051831608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_31

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_31

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783319960739

T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

SP - 286

EP - 294

BT - Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association

A2 - Fujita, Yushi

A2 - Bagnara, Sebastiano

A2 - Tartaglia, Riccardo

A2 - Albolino, Sara

A2 - Alexander, Thomas

PB - Springer

ER -

Butmee T, Lansdown TC, Walker GH. Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task: A review literature. In Fujita Y, Bagnara S, Tartaglia R, Albolino S, Alexander T, editors, Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association: IEA 2018. Springer. 2019. p. 286-294. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_31