TY - JOUR
T1 - Maximum likelihood estimation of regularization parameters in high-dimensional inverse problems
T2 - An empirical bayesian approach part i: Methodology and experiments
AU - Fernandez Vidal, Ana
AU - De Bortoli, Valentin
AU - Pereyra, Marcelo
AU - Durmus, Alain
N1 - Funding Information:
∗Received by the editors May 26, 2020; accepted for publication (in revised form) July 20, 2020; published electronically November 18, 2020. Part of this work appeared in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2018, pp. 1742–1746. Code and test data are available online from https: //github.com/anafvidal/research-code. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1339829 Funding: The work of the third author was supported by UKRI/EPSRC grant EP/T007346/1. The work of the fourth author was supported by Polish National Science Center grant NCN UMO-2018/31/B/ST1/00253. †Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences and School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK (a.fernandez [email protected], [email protected]). ‡CMLA - École normale supérieure Paris-Saclay, CNRS, UniversitéParis-Saclay, 94235 Cachan, France (valentin. [email protected], [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics © by SIAM. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
PY - 2020/11/18
Y1 - 2020/11/18
N2 - Many imaging problems require solving an inverse problem that is ill-conditioned or ill-posed. Imaging methods typically address this difficulty by regularizing the estimation problem to make it well-posed. This often requires setting the value of the so-called regularization parameters that control the amount of regularization enforced. These parameters are notoriously difficult to set a priori and can have a dramatic impact on the recovered estimates. In this work, we propose a general empirical Bayesian method for setting regularization parameters in imaging problems that are convex w.r.t. the unknown image. Our method calibrates regularization parameters directly from the observed data by maximum marginal likelihood estimation and can simultaneously estimate multiple regular-ization parameters. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm uses the same basic operators as proximal optimization algorithms, namely gradient and proximal operators, and it is therefore straightfor-ward to apply to problems that are currently solved by using proximal optimization techniques. Our methodology is demonstrated with a range of experiments and comparisons with alternative approaches from the literature. The considered experiments include image denoising, nonblind image deconvolution, and hyperspectral unmixing, using synthesis and analysis priors involving the ℓ1, total-variation, total-variation and ℓ1, and total-generalized-variation pseudonorms. A detailed theoretical analysis of the proposed method is presented in our companion paper.
AB - Many imaging problems require solving an inverse problem that is ill-conditioned or ill-posed. Imaging methods typically address this difficulty by regularizing the estimation problem to make it well-posed. This often requires setting the value of the so-called regularization parameters that control the amount of regularization enforced. These parameters are notoriously difficult to set a priori and can have a dramatic impact on the recovered estimates. In this work, we propose a general empirical Bayesian method for setting regularization parameters in imaging problems that are convex w.r.t. the unknown image. Our method calibrates regularization parameters directly from the observed data by maximum marginal likelihood estimation and can simultaneously estimate multiple regular-ization parameters. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm uses the same basic operators as proximal optimization algorithms, namely gradient and proximal operators, and it is therefore straightfor-ward to apply to problems that are currently solved by using proximal optimization techniques. Our methodology is demonstrated with a range of experiments and comparisons with alternative approaches from the literature. The considered experiments include image denoising, nonblind image deconvolution, and hyperspectral unmixing, using synthesis and analysis priors involving the ℓ1, total-variation, total-variation and ℓ1, and total-generalized-variation pseudonorms. A detailed theoretical analysis of the proposed method is presented in our companion paper.
KW - Empirical Bayes
KW - Image processing
KW - Inverse problems
KW - Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
KW - Proximal algorithms
KW - Statistical inference
KW - Stochastic optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099051400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1137/20M1339829
DO - 10.1137/20M1339829
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099051400
SN - 1936-4954
VL - 13
SP - 1945
EP - 1989
JO - SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
JF - SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
IS - 4
ER -