Maritime ecosystem-based management in practice: Lessons learned from the application of a generic spatial planning framework in Europe

Lene Buhl-Mortensen, Ibon Galparsoro, Tomas Vega Fernandez, Kate Johnson, Giovanni D'Anna, Fabio Badalamenti, Germana Garofalo, Julia Carlström, Joanna Piwowarczyk, Marijn Rabaut, Jan Vanaverbeke, Cor Schipper, Jan van Dalfsen, Vassiliki Vassilopoulou, Yiannis Issaris, Luc van Hoof, Ellen Pecceu, Kris Hostens, Marie Louise Pace, Leyla KnittweisVanessa Stelzenmuller, Valentina Todorova, Valentina Doncheva

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A generic framework (FW) for the monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas (here defined as marine areas subject to a planning and management regime) was developed and tested in nine marine areas of 13 European countries under the EU funded project MESMA (Monitoring and Evaluation of Spatially Managed Areas). This paper describes the lessons learned in the use of the FW and draws conclusions for its future use and development. The selected case studies represented diverse spatial scales, management status and complexity, ranging from sub-national areas to entire national coastlines, and large offshore regions. The application of the FW consisted of seven steps: starting with (i) context setting and (ii) gathering of relevant ecosystem information, human activities and management goals; it continues with (iii) indicator selection and (iv) risk assessment; and the final steps considers the (v) analysis of findings and (vi) the evaluation of management effectiveness, to end up with (vii) the revision and proposal of adaptation to current management. The lessons learnt through the application of the FW in the case studies have proved the value of the FW. However, difficulties rose due to the diversity of the nature and the different stages of development in planning and management in the case study areas; as well as, limited knowledge on ecosystem functioning needed for its implementation. As a conclusion the FW allowed for a flexible and creative application and provided important gap analyses.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)174-186
    Number of pages13
    JournalMarine Policy
    Volume75
    Early online date8 Feb 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • Blue Growth
    • Human activities
    • Management
    • Marine Spatial Planning
    • MSP-Framework
    • Spatial use conflicts

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Aquatic Science
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Environmental Science(all)
    • Law
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Maritime ecosystem-based management in practice: Lessons learned from the application of a generic spatial planning framework in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this