Abstract
This research compared the ability of Landsat ETM+, Quickbird and three image classification methods for discriminating amongst coral reefs and associated habitats in Pacific Panama. Landsat ETM+ and Quickbird were able to discriminate coarse and intermediate habitat classes, but this was sensitive to classification method. Quickbird was significantly more accurate than Landsat (14% to 17%). Contextual editing was found to improve the user's accuracy of important habitats. The integration of object-oriented classification with non-spectral information in eCognition produced the most accurate results. This method allowed sufficiently accurate maps to be produced from Landsat, which was not possible using the maximum likelihood classifier. Object-oriented classification was up to 24% more accurate than the maximum likelihood classifier for Landsat and up to 17% more accurate for Quickbird. The research indicates that classification methodology should be an important consideration in coral reef remote sensing. An object-oriented approach to image classification shows potential for improving coral reef resource inventory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5047-5070 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | International Journal of Remote Sensing |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 22 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Nov 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping the distribution of coral reefs and associated sublittoral habitats in Pacific Panama: A comparison of optical satellite sensors and classification methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver