TY - GEN
T1 - Making co-op work for you
T2 - an exploration of student attitudes to co-op programs in the US and the UK
AU - Berg, Tessa
AU - Smith, Sally
AU - Smith, Colin
AU - Ramirez, Nichole
AU - Main, Joyce
AU - Trina, Fletcher
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - University engineering and computing courses have a long tradition of co-operative education that plays a vital role in developing students' applied skills and giving confidence to students and potential employers. Nevertheless, not all students choose to participate in a co-op course. Our study was designed to explore the reasons why students did not participate in the co-op program and what perceptions participants have about the program. We also consider students' backgrounds that may play a role in their choice. Participants were in one of three groups: 1) those who were disinterested, 2) those who were interested and/or registered but did not complete a co-op program and 3) those who are currently participating in co-op. We used a qualitative approach, including surveys and interviews, to compare and contrast experiences, approaches, motivations and attitudes of student groups in the US and the UK. Initial results show that US and UK students who identified as disinterested in the program share similar perceptions, including the perceived cost of additional time to graduation. Students also express concern that taking time away from campus to complete a co-op affects social interactions with their peers. However, we found that students' experiences in computing and engineering differ depending on their routes in to their course of study. The overall aim was to uncover ways to increase participation in co-op education to the benefit of engineering and computing students: making co-op work.
AB - University engineering and computing courses have a long tradition of co-operative education that plays a vital role in developing students' applied skills and giving confidence to students and potential employers. Nevertheless, not all students choose to participate in a co-op course. Our study was designed to explore the reasons why students did not participate in the co-op program and what perceptions participants have about the program. We also consider students' backgrounds that may play a role in their choice. Participants were in one of three groups: 1) those who were disinterested, 2) those who were interested and/or registered but did not complete a co-op program and 3) those who are currently participating in co-op. We used a qualitative approach, including surveys and interviews, to compare and contrast experiences, approaches, motivations and attitudes of student groups in the US and the UK. Initial results show that US and UK students who identified as disinterested in the program share similar perceptions, including the perceived cost of additional time to graduation. Students also express concern that taking time away from campus to complete a co-op affects social interactions with their peers. However, we found that students' experiences in computing and engineering differ depending on their routes in to their course of study. The overall aim was to uncover ways to increase participation in co-op education to the benefit of engineering and computing students: making co-op work.
M3 - Conference contribution
BT - WACE 19th World Conference on cooperative & work-integrated education
ER -