Abstract
Wind flow in urban areas is strongly affected by the urban geometry. In the last decades most of the geometries used to reproduce urban areas, both in wind-tunnel (WT) tests and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, were simplified compared to reality in order to limit experimental effort and computational costs. However, it is unclear to which extent these geometrical simplifications can affect the reliability of the numerical and experimental results. The goal of this paper is to quantify the deviations caused by geometrical simplifications. The case under study is the district of Livorno city (Italy), called “Quartiere La Venezia”. The 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations are solved, first for a single block of the district, then for the whole district. The CFD simulations are validated with WT tests at scale 1:300. Comparisons are made of mean wind velocity profiles between WT tests and CFD simulations, and the agreement is quantified using four validation metrics (FB, NMSE, R and FAC1.3). The results show that the most detailed geometry provides improved performance, especially for wind direction α = 240° (22% difference in terms of FAC1.3).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 238-255 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics |
Volume | 170 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |
Keywords
- CFD simulations
- Geometric uncertainties
- Model detailing
- Statistical performance
- Urban wind flow
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Mechanical Engineering