TY - JOUR
T1 - Legitimating State Capital
T2 - The Global Financial Professions and the Transnationalization of Chinese Sovereign Wealth
AU - Liu, Imogen T.
AU - Dixon, Adam D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This article is partly based on work conducted in association with COST Action CA18215 — China in Europe Research Network — supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). An earlier version of it was presented at a workshop held at COST, Brussels, on 7 November 2019. We are grateful to the workshop's participants for their comments. Thanks are also due to the special issue editors, Naná de Graaff and Jeffrey Henderson, and to Ilias Alami, Milan Babić, Aneta Spendzharova, and the anonymous reviewers, for their constructive feedback. Grant funding was provided by the European Research Council‐funded SWFsEUROPE project under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 758430).
Funding Information:
This article is partly based on work conducted in association with COST Action CA18215 ? China in Europe Research Network ? supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). An earlier version of it was presented at a workshop held at COST, Brussels, on 7 November 2019. We are grateful to the workshop's participants for their comments. Thanks are also due to the special issue editors, Nan? de Graaff and Jeffrey Henderson, and to Ilias Alami, Milan Babi?, Aneta Spendzharova, and the anonymous reviewers, for their constructive feedback. Grant funding was provided by the European Research Council-funded SWFsEUROPE project under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 758430).
Funding Information:
First, the CIC has established bilateral and multilateral partnerships with other SWFs such as the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) and the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, as well as investments in Chinese state‐owned funds including the Silk Road Fund (CIC, 2016 : 34; 2019 : 51). These ventures sit alongside private partnerships like those announced with HSBC and Nomura Securities (Yue and Lu, 2018 ). While these bilateral agreements adhered to commercial principles, the CIC is also an active participant of the Belt and Road Initiative (CIC, 2019 : 4). Infrastructure is a priority sector of the Russia–China Investment Fund which has signed, together with RDIF and Vnescheconombank, a memorandum of understanding with the CIC to promote infrastructural projects in Russia's Far East (CIC, 2013 ). Similarly, the Silk Road Fund provides direct funding to Belt and Road projects and has jointly funded, with the European Investment Fund, a subsidiary of the European Investment Bank, the China–EU Co‐investment Fund (CECIF) under the Juncker Plan. With a first‐round commitment of € 500 million, the CECIF targets European small‐ to medium‐size enterprises with an interest in the China market (European Investment Fund, 2018 ). These funds recreate established joint‐funding structures prevalent in institutional investing, but are also instances in which capital is directed toward strategic industry areas.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Development and Change published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Institute of Social Studies
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Increasing Chinese investment has raised the spectre of strategic state influence in Europe, yet the transformative potential of state capital as a global phenomenon remains under-explored. This article sheds light on the dual imperatives of transnationalizing state capital wherein the movement of capital entails both profit maximization and the extra-profit interests of the state. State-capitalist entities such as sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) are both market-facing and politically driven, disrupting ideological norms surrounding the strictly safe-keeper role of the state in private capital accumulation. The authors draw on the case of the China Investment Corporation, China's premier SWF, to argue that the transnationalization of state capital is a process deeply embedded in the liberal international order, and that it signals the metamorphosis of global capitalism in palimpsest-like ways. The global financial professions, namely investment banking, corporate law and management consulting along with other advisory services, have legitimated state capital by normalizing its political origins through technocratic, expert-driven practice to the effect that it is treated as no different from private capital in global capital networks. The article identifies three logics of practice by which professionals legitimate state capital: adoption, alliance and recreation of financial practices that have facilitated the embeddedness of state capital in global markets.
AB - Increasing Chinese investment has raised the spectre of strategic state influence in Europe, yet the transformative potential of state capital as a global phenomenon remains under-explored. This article sheds light on the dual imperatives of transnationalizing state capital wherein the movement of capital entails both profit maximization and the extra-profit interests of the state. State-capitalist entities such as sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) are both market-facing and politically driven, disrupting ideological norms surrounding the strictly safe-keeper role of the state in private capital accumulation. The authors draw on the case of the China Investment Corporation, China's premier SWF, to argue that the transnationalization of state capital is a process deeply embedded in the liberal international order, and that it signals the metamorphosis of global capitalism in palimpsest-like ways. The global financial professions, namely investment banking, corporate law and management consulting along with other advisory services, have legitimated state capital by normalizing its political origins through technocratic, expert-driven practice to the effect that it is treated as no different from private capital in global capital networks. The article identifies three logics of practice by which professionals legitimate state capital: adoption, alliance and recreation of financial practices that have facilitated the embeddedness of state capital in global markets.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116309565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/dech.12681
DO - 10.1111/dech.12681
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85116309565
SN - 0012-155X
VL - 52
SP - 1251
EP - 1273
JO - Development and Change
JF - Development and Change
IS - 5
ER -