Legal compliance in street-level bureaucracy: a study of UK housing officers

Caroline Hunter, Joanne Bretherton, Simon Halliday, Sarah Johnsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Street-level bureaucratic theory is now at a fairly mature stage. The focus on street-level bureaucrats as ultimate policymakers is now as familiar as it is important. Likewise, the parallel sociolegal study of the implementation of public law in public organizations has demonstrated the inevitable gap between law-in-the-books and law-in-action. Yet, the success of these advances comes at the potential cost of us losing sight of the importance of law itself. This article analyses some empirical data on the decision making about one legal concept—vulnerability in UK homelessness law. Our analysis offers two main contributions. First, we argue that, when it comes to the implementation of law, the legal abilities and propensities of the bureaucrats must be taken into account. Bureaucrats’ abilities to understand legal materials make a difference to the likelihood of legal compliance. Second, we must also pay attention to the character of the legal provisions. Where a provision is simple, it is more likely to facilitate legal knowledge and demands nothing of bureaucrats in terms of legal competence. Where the provision is also inoffensive and liveable, it is less likely to act as an impediment to legal conscientiousness.
LanguageEnglish
Pages81-95
JournalLaw and Policy
Volume38
Issue number1
Early online date3 Dec 2015
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

bureaucracy
housing
Law
legal provision
public law
ability
homelessness
vulnerability
decision making
costs

Cite this

Hunter, Caroline ; Bretherton, Joanne ; Halliday, Simon ; Johnsen, Sarah. / Legal compliance in street-level bureaucracy: a study of UK housing officers. In: Law and Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 81-95
@article{bd450ccaaaec41b495859d46f78ed813,
title = "Legal compliance in street-level bureaucracy: a study of UK housing officers",
abstract = "Street-level bureaucratic theory is now at a fairly mature stage. The focus on street-level bureaucrats as ultimate policymakers is now as familiar as it is important. Likewise, the parallel sociolegal study of the implementation of public law in public organizations has demonstrated the inevitable gap between law-in-the-books and law-in-action. Yet, the success of these advances comes at the potential cost of us losing sight of the importance of law itself. This article analyses some empirical data on the decision making about one legal concept—vulnerability in UK homelessness law. Our analysis offers two main contributions. First, we argue that, when it comes to the implementation of law, the legal abilities and propensities of the bureaucrats must be taken into account. Bureaucrats’ abilities to understand legal materials make a difference to the likelihood of legal compliance. Second, we must also pay attention to the character of the legal provisions. Where a provision is simple, it is more likely to facilitate legal knowledge and demands nothing of bureaucrats in terms of legal competence. Where the provision is also inoffensive and liveable, it is less likely to act as an impediment to legal conscientiousness.",
author = "Caroline Hunter and Joanne Bretherton and Simon Halliday and Sarah Johnsen",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lapo.12049",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "81--95",
journal = "Law and Policy",
issn = "0265-8240",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Hunter, C, Bretherton, J, Halliday, S & Johnsen, S 2016, 'Legal compliance in street-level bureaucracy: a study of UK housing officers' Law and Policy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 81-95. DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12049

Legal compliance in street-level bureaucracy: a study of UK housing officers. / Hunter, Caroline; Bretherton, Joanne; Halliday, Simon; Johnsen, Sarah.

In: Law and Policy, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.2016, p. 81-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal compliance in street-level bureaucracy: a study of UK housing officers

AU - Hunter,Caroline

AU - Bretherton,Joanne

AU - Halliday,Simon

AU - Johnsen,Sarah

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - Street-level bureaucratic theory is now at a fairly mature stage. The focus on street-level bureaucrats as ultimate policymakers is now as familiar as it is important. Likewise, the parallel sociolegal study of the implementation of public law in public organizations has demonstrated the inevitable gap between law-in-the-books and law-in-action. Yet, the success of these advances comes at the potential cost of us losing sight of the importance of law itself. This article analyses some empirical data on the decision making about one legal concept—vulnerability in UK homelessness law. Our analysis offers two main contributions. First, we argue that, when it comes to the implementation of law, the legal abilities and propensities of the bureaucrats must be taken into account. Bureaucrats’ abilities to understand legal materials make a difference to the likelihood of legal compliance. Second, we must also pay attention to the character of the legal provisions. Where a provision is simple, it is more likely to facilitate legal knowledge and demands nothing of bureaucrats in terms of legal competence. Where the provision is also inoffensive and liveable, it is less likely to act as an impediment to legal conscientiousness.

AB - Street-level bureaucratic theory is now at a fairly mature stage. The focus on street-level bureaucrats as ultimate policymakers is now as familiar as it is important. Likewise, the parallel sociolegal study of the implementation of public law in public organizations has demonstrated the inevitable gap between law-in-the-books and law-in-action. Yet, the success of these advances comes at the potential cost of us losing sight of the importance of law itself. This article analyses some empirical data on the decision making about one legal concept—vulnerability in UK homelessness law. Our analysis offers two main contributions. First, we argue that, when it comes to the implementation of law, the legal abilities and propensities of the bureaucrats must be taken into account. Bureaucrats’ abilities to understand legal materials make a difference to the likelihood of legal compliance. Second, we must also pay attention to the character of the legal provisions. Where a provision is simple, it is more likely to facilitate legal knowledge and demands nothing of bureaucrats in terms of legal competence. Where the provision is also inoffensive and liveable, it is less likely to act as an impediment to legal conscientiousness.

U2 - 10.1111/lapo.12049

DO - 10.1111/lapo.12049

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 81

EP - 95

JO - Law and Policy

T2 - Law and Policy

JF - Law and Policy

SN - 0265-8240

IS - 1

ER -

Hunter C, Bretherton J, Halliday S, Johnsen S. Legal compliance in street-level bureaucracy: a study of UK housing officers. Law and Policy. 2016 Jan;38(1):81-95. Available from, DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12049