'It's just one of those natural progressions': Stories of relocating to neighbourhoods of high and low walkability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Walkable neighbourhood characteristics, such as connectivity and land use mix, have been found to correlate with people walking more and being active. However, the relationship between the built environment and behaviour is highly complex making it difficult to develop generalisable and predictive models. This paper reports qualitative findings from 21 in-depth interviews conducted with urban residents who had relocated between neighbourhoods of high and low walkability. Participants’ preferences are reported within key domains (shop access, green space and travel links). These reveal that walkable characteristics were preferred and desired regardless of whether the participant had moved to a high or low walkable area. We contrast surface preferences with an analysis of relocation stories: complex assemblages of biographical narratives, identity work and cultural representations. The findings reveal how neighbourhood types are consistently associated with life stages and that moving to a suburban home was felt to be a definitive type of relocation in which it was acceptable to put neighbourhood preferences aside. Residential self-selection is not yet properly understood and we recommend studies of relocation stories for examining the sociocultural meanings that are likely to inform relocation decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102509
JournalHealth and Place
Volume69
Early online date13 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Keywords

  • Lifecourse
  • Qualitative
  • Relocation
  • Urban
  • Walkability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''It's just one of those natural progressions': Stories of relocating to neighbourhoods of high and low walkability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this