TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the China Effect Real? Ideational Change and the Political Contestation of Chinese State-Led Investment in Europe
AU - Babić, Milan
AU - Dixon, Adam D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 758430).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s).
PY - 2022/4/27
Y1 - 2022/4/27
N2 - Chinese outward investment is increasing in its relevance for the global economy, and its effects on host states are increasingly being scrutinized globally. While European policy-making was ambiguous about the question of hosting Chinese state-led investment (CSLI) in the early 2010s, we can observe a recent surge of protectionist legal measures across Europe. What explains this trend among different European countries? Through the lens of incremental ideational change, we hypothesize that the rise of China as a global investor shifts the perceptions of policy-makers away from being a source of investment toward a potential threat to national security. We argue that this China effect affects advanced European economies similarly. We provide evidence by studying the shift in perceptions among policy-makers in a coordinated and a liberal market economy, Germany and the UK. By drawing on document analysis and expert interviews, we unpack the policy processes in both countries in the last decade. Despite being two dissimilar cases, both show a similar outcome in increasingly curbing CSLI on the grounds of national security reasons. Our results add important insights to recent International Political Economy discussions on the "geopoliticization"of European trade and investment rules in the face of a rising China.
AB - Chinese outward investment is increasing in its relevance for the global economy, and its effects on host states are increasingly being scrutinized globally. While European policy-making was ambiguous about the question of hosting Chinese state-led investment (CSLI) in the early 2010s, we can observe a recent surge of protectionist legal measures across Europe. What explains this trend among different European countries? Through the lens of incremental ideational change, we hypothesize that the rise of China as a global investor shifts the perceptions of policy-makers away from being a source of investment toward a potential threat to national security. We argue that this China effect affects advanced European economies similarly. We provide evidence by studying the shift in perceptions among policy-makers in a coordinated and a liberal market economy, Germany and the UK. By drawing on document analysis and expert interviews, we unpack the policy processes in both countries in the last decade. Despite being two dissimilar cases, both show a similar outcome in increasingly curbing CSLI on the grounds of national security reasons. Our results add important insights to recent International Political Economy discussions on the "geopoliticization"of European trade and investment rules in the face of a rising China.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132418411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/cjip/poac009
DO - 10.1093/cjip/poac009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85132418411
SN - 1750-8916
VL - 15
SP - 111
EP - 139
JO - Chinese Journal of International Politics
JF - Chinese Journal of International Politics
IS - 2
ER -