IS degrees: Sociotechnical or technosocial? - a reflective analysis

Tessa Berg, Robert John Pooley, Jenny Coady

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

This paper describes a reflective and empirical investigation by staff involved in delivery of the Heriot-Watt University Information Systems undergraduate degree. It looks particularly at the practical relevance of the IS 2010 model curriculum, asking to what extent the Heriot-Watt University Information Systems teaching staff supports the model and identifying areas of conflicting opinion. These are compared with empirical evidence of relevance to employability in the form of statistics on graduate destinations from cohorts in 2010 and 2011. An IS virtual alumni forum was set up for past students to debate the IS degree and discuss areas of relevance to careers and suggestions for further improvement. In agreement with the IS 2010 model, graduate discussion and working panel reflection both propose the inclusion of a project management course. Graduates also suggest the need for more specialised technical skills in software and web development and a stronger grounding in spreadsheet application software including statistical processing methods. In agreement with the working panel, graduates state the importance of having quality experienced teaching delivered with skill and enthusiasm. Further work is then proposed to encourage continuous reflective practice and enhance student experience.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBuilding Sustainable Information Systems
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Systems Development
Pages219-231
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4614-7540-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'IS degrees: Sociotechnical or technosocial? - a reflective analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this