Is a position-dependent stiffness relevant for the wetting phase diagram?

F. Clarysse, C. J. Boulter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper we determine the wetting phase diagram for three-dimensional systems with short-range forces assuming the presence of a position-dependent stiffness contribution as recently proposed [M.E. Fisher and A.J. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 792 (1992)]. We predict a discontinuous transformation of the phase diagram immediately upon moving beyond the mean-field approximation. However, in contrast to Fisher and Jin we find that a renormalization group calculation yields fluctuation-induced second-order transitions rather than fluctuation-induced first-order ones. As a consequence, in all fluctuation regimes we recover the same qualitative phase diagram as predicted in the absence of a position-dependent stiffness coefficient. Furthermore, recent predictions for tricritical wetting behavior remain unaffected by the stiffness contribution. © 2002 The American Physical Society.

Original languageEnglish
Article number031607
Pages (from-to)031607/1-031607/7
JournalPhysical Review E
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2002

Cite this

Clarysse, F. ; Boulter, C. J. / Is a position-dependent stiffness relevant for the wetting phase diagram?. In: Physical Review E. 2002 ; Vol. 65, No. 3. pp. 031607/1-031607/7.
@article{13c87b17b6a4410f92404ef91e40dc57,
title = "Is a position-dependent stiffness relevant for the wetting phase diagram?",
abstract = "In this paper we determine the wetting phase diagram for three-dimensional systems with short-range forces assuming the presence of a position-dependent stiffness contribution as recently proposed [M.E. Fisher and A.J. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 792 (1992)]. We predict a discontinuous transformation of the phase diagram immediately upon moving beyond the mean-field approximation. However, in contrast to Fisher and Jin we find that a renormalization group calculation yields fluctuation-induced second-order transitions rather than fluctuation-induced first-order ones. As a consequence, in all fluctuation regimes we recover the same qualitative phase diagram as predicted in the absence of a position-dependent stiffness coefficient. Furthermore, recent predictions for tricritical wetting behavior remain unaffected by the stiffness contribution. {\circledC} 2002 The American Physical Society.",
author = "F. Clarysse and Boulter, {C. J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevE.65.031607",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "031607/1--031607/7",
journal = "Physical Review E",
issn = "1539-3755",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "3",

}

Is a position-dependent stiffness relevant for the wetting phase diagram? / Clarysse, F.; Boulter, C. J.

In: Physical Review E, Vol. 65, No. 3, 031607, 03.2002, p. 031607/1-031607/7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is a position-dependent stiffness relevant for the wetting phase diagram?

AU - Clarysse, F.

AU - Boulter, C. J.

PY - 2002/3

Y1 - 2002/3

N2 - In this paper we determine the wetting phase diagram for three-dimensional systems with short-range forces assuming the presence of a position-dependent stiffness contribution as recently proposed [M.E. Fisher and A.J. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 792 (1992)]. We predict a discontinuous transformation of the phase diagram immediately upon moving beyond the mean-field approximation. However, in contrast to Fisher and Jin we find that a renormalization group calculation yields fluctuation-induced second-order transitions rather than fluctuation-induced first-order ones. As a consequence, in all fluctuation regimes we recover the same qualitative phase diagram as predicted in the absence of a position-dependent stiffness coefficient. Furthermore, recent predictions for tricritical wetting behavior remain unaffected by the stiffness contribution. © 2002 The American Physical Society.

AB - In this paper we determine the wetting phase diagram for three-dimensional systems with short-range forces assuming the presence of a position-dependent stiffness contribution as recently proposed [M.E. Fisher and A.J. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 792 (1992)]. We predict a discontinuous transformation of the phase diagram immediately upon moving beyond the mean-field approximation. However, in contrast to Fisher and Jin we find that a renormalization group calculation yields fluctuation-induced second-order transitions rather than fluctuation-induced first-order ones. As a consequence, in all fluctuation regimes we recover the same qualitative phase diagram as predicted in the absence of a position-dependent stiffness coefficient. Furthermore, recent predictions for tricritical wetting behavior remain unaffected by the stiffness contribution. © 2002 The American Physical Society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37649027921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.031607

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.031607

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 031607/1-031607/7

JO - Physical Review E

JF - Physical Review E

SN - 1539-3755

IS - 3

M1 - 031607

ER -