Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys

Emma C. Tecwyn, Stephanie Denison, Emily J E Messer, Daphna Buchsbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ability to reason about probabilities has ecological relevance for many species. Recent research has shown that both preverbal infants and non-human great apes can make predictions about single-item samples randomly drawn from populations by reasoning about proportions. To further explore the evolutionary origins of this ability, we conducted the first investigation of probabilistic inference in a monkey species (capuchins; Sapajus spp.). Across four experiments, capuchins (N = 19) were presented with two populations of food items that differed in their relative distribution of preferred and non-preferred items, such that one population was more likely to yield a preferred item. In each trial, capuchins had to select between hidden single-item samples randomly drawn from each population. In Experiment 1 each population was homogeneous so reasoning about proportions was not required; Experiments 2–3 replicated previous probabilistic reasoning research with infants and apes; and Experiment 4 was a novel condition untested in other species, providing an important extension to previous work. Results revealed that at least some capuchins were able to make probabilistic inferences via reasoning about proportions as opposed to simpler quantity heuristics. Performance was relatively poor in Experiment 4, so the possibility remains that capuchins may use quantity-based heuristics in some situations, though further work is required to confirm this. Interestingly, performance was not at ceiling in Experiment 1, which did not involve reasoning about proportions, but did involve sampling. This suggests that the sampling task posed demands in addition to reasoning about proportions, possibly related to inhibitory control, working memory, and/or knowledge of object permanence.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalAnimal Cognition
Early online date15 Oct 2016
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 15 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

experiment
Cebus
Hominidae
heuristics
sampling
Short-Term Memory
Food
food
prediction

Keywords

  • Capuchin
  • Intuitive statistics
  • Numerical cognition
  • Primate cognition
  • Probabilistic inference
  • Proportional reasoning

Cite this

Tecwyn, E. C., Denison, S., Messer, E. J. E., & Buchsbaum, D. (2016). Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9

Tecwyn, Emma C.; Denison, Stephanie; Messer, Emily J E; Buchsbaum, Daphna / Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys.

In: Animal Cognition, 15.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{091c917652104f7ba60fcf1ec8f2d6c2,
title = "Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys",
abstract = "The ability to reason about probabilities has ecological relevance for many species. Recent research has shown that both preverbal infants and non-human great apes can make predictions about single-item samples randomly drawn from populations by reasoning about proportions. To further explore the evolutionary origins of this ability, we conducted the first investigation of probabilistic inference in a monkey species (capuchins; Sapajus spp.). Across four experiments, capuchins (N = 19) were presented with two populations of food items that differed in their relative distribution of preferred and non-preferred items, such that one population was more likely to yield a preferred item. In each trial, capuchins had to select between hidden single-item samples randomly drawn from each population. In Experiment 1 each population was homogeneous so reasoning about proportions was not required; Experiments 2–3 replicated previous probabilistic reasoning research with infants and apes; and Experiment 4 was a novel condition untested in other species, providing an important extension to previous work. Results revealed that at least some capuchins were able to make probabilistic inferences via reasoning about proportions as opposed to simpler quantity heuristics. Performance was relatively poor in Experiment 4, so the possibility remains that capuchins may use quantity-based heuristics in some situations, though further work is required to confirm this. Interestingly, performance was not at ceiling in Experiment 1, which did not involve reasoning about proportions, but did involve sampling. This suggests that the sampling task posed demands in addition to reasoning about proportions, possibly related to inhibitory control, working memory, and/or knowledge of object permanence.",
keywords = "Capuchin, Intuitive statistics, Numerical cognition, Primate cognition, Probabilistic inference, Proportional reasoning",
author = "Tecwyn, {Emma C.} and Stephanie Denison and Messer, {Emily J E} and Daphna Buchsbaum",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9",
journal = "Animal Cognition",
issn = "1435-9448",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

Tecwyn, EC, Denison, S, Messer, EJE & Buchsbaum, D 2016, 'Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys' Animal Cognition. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9

Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. / Tecwyn, Emma C.; Denison, Stephanie; Messer, Emily J E; Buchsbaum, Daphna.

In: Animal Cognition, 15.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys

AU - Tecwyn,Emma C.

AU - Denison,Stephanie

AU - Messer,Emily J E

AU - Buchsbaum,Daphna

PY - 2016/10/15

Y1 - 2016/10/15

N2 - The ability to reason about probabilities has ecological relevance for many species. Recent research has shown that both preverbal infants and non-human great apes can make predictions about single-item samples randomly drawn from populations by reasoning about proportions. To further explore the evolutionary origins of this ability, we conducted the first investigation of probabilistic inference in a monkey species (capuchins; Sapajus spp.). Across four experiments, capuchins (N = 19) were presented with two populations of food items that differed in their relative distribution of preferred and non-preferred items, such that one population was more likely to yield a preferred item. In each trial, capuchins had to select between hidden single-item samples randomly drawn from each population. In Experiment 1 each population was homogeneous so reasoning about proportions was not required; Experiments 2–3 replicated previous probabilistic reasoning research with infants and apes; and Experiment 4 was a novel condition untested in other species, providing an important extension to previous work. Results revealed that at least some capuchins were able to make probabilistic inferences via reasoning about proportions as opposed to simpler quantity heuristics. Performance was relatively poor in Experiment 4, so the possibility remains that capuchins may use quantity-based heuristics in some situations, though further work is required to confirm this. Interestingly, performance was not at ceiling in Experiment 1, which did not involve reasoning about proportions, but did involve sampling. This suggests that the sampling task posed demands in addition to reasoning about proportions, possibly related to inhibitory control, working memory, and/or knowledge of object permanence.

AB - The ability to reason about probabilities has ecological relevance for many species. Recent research has shown that both preverbal infants and non-human great apes can make predictions about single-item samples randomly drawn from populations by reasoning about proportions. To further explore the evolutionary origins of this ability, we conducted the first investigation of probabilistic inference in a monkey species (capuchins; Sapajus spp.). Across four experiments, capuchins (N = 19) were presented with two populations of food items that differed in their relative distribution of preferred and non-preferred items, such that one population was more likely to yield a preferred item. In each trial, capuchins had to select between hidden single-item samples randomly drawn from each population. In Experiment 1 each population was homogeneous so reasoning about proportions was not required; Experiments 2–3 replicated previous probabilistic reasoning research with infants and apes; and Experiment 4 was a novel condition untested in other species, providing an important extension to previous work. Results revealed that at least some capuchins were able to make probabilistic inferences via reasoning about proportions as opposed to simpler quantity heuristics. Performance was relatively poor in Experiment 4, so the possibility remains that capuchins may use quantity-based heuristics in some situations, though further work is required to confirm this. Interestingly, performance was not at ceiling in Experiment 1, which did not involve reasoning about proportions, but did involve sampling. This suggests that the sampling task posed demands in addition to reasoning about proportions, possibly related to inhibitory control, working memory, and/or knowledge of object permanence.

KW - Capuchin

KW - Intuitive statistics

KW - Numerical cognition

KW - Primate cognition

KW - Probabilistic inference

KW - Proportional reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991340907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9

DO - 10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9

M3 - Article

JO - Animal Cognition

T2 - Animal Cognition

JF - Animal Cognition

SN - 1435-9448

ER -

Tecwyn EC, Denison S, Messer EJE, Buchsbaum D. Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition. 2016 Oct 15. Available from, DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9