Intracellular imaging of nanoparticles: is it an elemental mistake to believe what you see?

Christina Brandenberger, Martin J. D. Clift, Dimitri Vanhecke, Christian Muehlfeld, Vicki Stone, Peter Gehr, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In order to understand how nanoparticles (NPs < 100 nm) interact with cellular systems, potentially causing adverse effects, it is important to be able to detect and localize them within cells. Due to the small size of NPs, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an appropriate technique to use for visualizing NPs inside cells, since light microscopy fails to resolve them at a single particle level. However, the presence of other cellular and non-cellular nano-sized structures in TEM cell samples, which may resemble NPs in size, morphology and electron density, can obstruct the precise intracellular identification of NPs. Therefore, elemental analysis is recommended to confirm the presence of NPs inside the cell. The present study highlights the necessity to perform elemental analysis, specifically energy filtering TEM, to confirm intracellular NP localization using the example of quantum dots (QDs). Recently, QDs have gained increased attention due to their fluorescent characteristics, and possible applications for biomedical imaging have been suggested. Nevertheless, potential adverse effects cannot be excluded and some studies point to a correlation between intracellular particle localization and toxic effects.

    J774.A1 murine macrophage-like cells were exposed to NH2 polyethylene (PEG) QDs and elemental co-localization analysis of two elements present in the QDs (sulfur and cadmium) was performed on putative intracellular QDs with electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI). Both elements were shown on a single particle level and QDs were confirmed to be located inside intracellular vesicles. Nevertheless, ESI analysis showed that not all nano-sized structures, initially identified as QDs, were confirmed. This observation emphasizes the necessity to perform elemental analysis when investigating intracellular NP localization using TEM.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number15
    Number of pages6
    JournalParticle and Fibre Toxicology
    Volume7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2010

    Cite this

    Brandenberger, C., Clift, M. J. D., Vanhecke, D., Muehlfeld, C., Stone, V., Gehr, P., & Rothen-Rutishauser, B. (2010). Intracellular imaging of nanoparticles: is it an elemental mistake to believe what you see? Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 7, [15]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-7-15
    Brandenberger, Christina ; Clift, Martin J. D. ; Vanhecke, Dimitri ; Muehlfeld, Christian ; Stone, Vicki ; Gehr, Peter ; Rothen-Rutishauser, Barbara. / Intracellular imaging of nanoparticles : is it an elemental mistake to believe what you see?. In: Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2010 ; Vol. 7.
    @article{772a1752cf5f4a99b67445e74b900077,
    title = "Intracellular imaging of nanoparticles: is it an elemental mistake to believe what you see?",
    abstract = "In order to understand how nanoparticles (NPs < 100 nm) interact with cellular systems, potentially causing adverse effects, it is important to be able to detect and localize them within cells. Due to the small size of NPs, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an appropriate technique to use for visualizing NPs inside cells, since light microscopy fails to resolve them at a single particle level. However, the presence of other cellular and non-cellular nano-sized structures in TEM cell samples, which may resemble NPs in size, morphology and electron density, can obstruct the precise intracellular identification of NPs. Therefore, elemental analysis is recommended to confirm the presence of NPs inside the cell. The present study highlights the necessity to perform elemental analysis, specifically energy filtering TEM, to confirm intracellular NP localization using the example of quantum dots (QDs). Recently, QDs have gained increased attention due to their fluorescent characteristics, and possible applications for biomedical imaging have been suggested. Nevertheless, potential adverse effects cannot be excluded and some studies point to a correlation between intracellular particle localization and toxic effects.J774.A1 murine macrophage-like cells were exposed to NH2 polyethylene (PEG) QDs and elemental co-localization analysis of two elements present in the QDs (sulfur and cadmium) was performed on putative intracellular QDs with electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI). Both elements were shown on a single particle level and QDs were confirmed to be located inside intracellular vesicles. Nevertheless, ESI analysis showed that not all nano-sized structures, initially identified as QDs, were confirmed. This observation emphasizes the necessity to perform elemental analysis when investigating intracellular NP localization using TEM.",
    author = "Christina Brandenberger and Clift, {Martin J. D.} and Dimitri Vanhecke and Christian Muehlfeld and Vicki Stone and Peter Gehr and Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser",
    year = "2010",
    month = "6",
    day = "3",
    doi = "10.1186/1743-8977-7-15",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    journal = "Particle and Fibre Toxicology",
    issn = "1743-8977",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",

    }

    Brandenberger, C, Clift, MJD, Vanhecke, D, Muehlfeld, C, Stone, V, Gehr, P & Rothen-Rutishauser, B 2010, 'Intracellular imaging of nanoparticles: is it an elemental mistake to believe what you see?', Particle and Fibre Toxicology, vol. 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-7-15

    Intracellular imaging of nanoparticles : is it an elemental mistake to believe what you see? / Brandenberger, Christina; Clift, Martin J. D.; Vanhecke, Dimitri; Muehlfeld, Christian; Stone, Vicki; Gehr, Peter; Rothen-Rutishauser, Barbara.

    In: Particle and Fibre Toxicology, Vol. 7, 15, 03.06.2010.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Intracellular imaging of nanoparticles

    T2 - is it an elemental mistake to believe what you see?

    AU - Brandenberger, Christina

    AU - Clift, Martin J. D.

    AU - Vanhecke, Dimitri

    AU - Muehlfeld, Christian

    AU - Stone, Vicki

    AU - Gehr, Peter

    AU - Rothen-Rutishauser, Barbara

    PY - 2010/6/3

    Y1 - 2010/6/3

    N2 - In order to understand how nanoparticles (NPs < 100 nm) interact with cellular systems, potentially causing adverse effects, it is important to be able to detect and localize them within cells. Due to the small size of NPs, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an appropriate technique to use for visualizing NPs inside cells, since light microscopy fails to resolve them at a single particle level. However, the presence of other cellular and non-cellular nano-sized structures in TEM cell samples, which may resemble NPs in size, morphology and electron density, can obstruct the precise intracellular identification of NPs. Therefore, elemental analysis is recommended to confirm the presence of NPs inside the cell. The present study highlights the necessity to perform elemental analysis, specifically energy filtering TEM, to confirm intracellular NP localization using the example of quantum dots (QDs). Recently, QDs have gained increased attention due to their fluorescent characteristics, and possible applications for biomedical imaging have been suggested. Nevertheless, potential adverse effects cannot be excluded and some studies point to a correlation between intracellular particle localization and toxic effects.J774.A1 murine macrophage-like cells were exposed to NH2 polyethylene (PEG) QDs and elemental co-localization analysis of two elements present in the QDs (sulfur and cadmium) was performed on putative intracellular QDs with electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI). Both elements were shown on a single particle level and QDs were confirmed to be located inside intracellular vesicles. Nevertheless, ESI analysis showed that not all nano-sized structures, initially identified as QDs, were confirmed. This observation emphasizes the necessity to perform elemental analysis when investigating intracellular NP localization using TEM.

    AB - In order to understand how nanoparticles (NPs < 100 nm) interact with cellular systems, potentially causing adverse effects, it is important to be able to detect and localize them within cells. Due to the small size of NPs, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an appropriate technique to use for visualizing NPs inside cells, since light microscopy fails to resolve them at a single particle level. However, the presence of other cellular and non-cellular nano-sized structures in TEM cell samples, which may resemble NPs in size, morphology and electron density, can obstruct the precise intracellular identification of NPs. Therefore, elemental analysis is recommended to confirm the presence of NPs inside the cell. The present study highlights the necessity to perform elemental analysis, specifically energy filtering TEM, to confirm intracellular NP localization using the example of quantum dots (QDs). Recently, QDs have gained increased attention due to their fluorescent characteristics, and possible applications for biomedical imaging have been suggested. Nevertheless, potential adverse effects cannot be excluded and some studies point to a correlation between intracellular particle localization and toxic effects.J774.A1 murine macrophage-like cells were exposed to NH2 polyethylene (PEG) QDs and elemental co-localization analysis of two elements present in the QDs (sulfur and cadmium) was performed on putative intracellular QDs with electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI). Both elements were shown on a single particle level and QDs were confirmed to be located inside intracellular vesicles. Nevertheless, ESI analysis showed that not all nano-sized structures, initially identified as QDs, were confirmed. This observation emphasizes the necessity to perform elemental analysis when investigating intracellular NP localization using TEM.

    U2 - 10.1186/1743-8977-7-15

    DO - 10.1186/1743-8977-7-15

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 20525241

    VL - 7

    JO - Particle and Fibre Toxicology

    JF - Particle and Fibre Toxicology

    SN - 1743-8977

    M1 - 15

    ER -