Interpersonal influence in the workplace

Influencing behaviour and 360-degree assessments

Tony Manning, Graham Pogson, Zoe Morrison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Purpose - The paper aims to present and discuss research into the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact, including gender and seniority differences. Design/methodology/approach - The paper builds on previous articles considering influencing behaviour in the workplace. These articles present a model of interpersonal influence and describe how individual influencing behaviour varies in different contexts. They identified the need for further investigation into the effectiveness of such behaviours in those contexts. This research utilises 360-degree performance assessments as an indicator of the "effectiveness" or impact of workplace influencing behaviours. Findings - The findings extend previous work supporting the idea that there are few, if any, influencing behaviours that apply to all situations and highlight the role of expectancies in work place assessments of influencing behaviours. Research limitations/implications - The research highlights ways in which the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact differ according to both the gender and seniority of those seeking to influence. This indicates that the "expectancies" of the influence or target affect perceptions of influencing behaviour and assessments of impact. This is consistent with the model of interpersonal influence previously developed, which includes explicit reference to feedback loops between behaviour, responses and expectancies. This raises further questions as to the impact of expectancies on 360-degree assessment, and the nature and fairness of assessment within organisational performance management systems.Originality/value - This paper challenges the idea that there are influencing strategies and styles that are effective, irrespective of context. It also highlights the role of expectancies within behavioural assessments in the workplace. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)258-269
    Number of pages12
    JournalIndustrial and Commercial Training
    Volume41
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2009

    Fingerprint

    Work place
    Interpersonal influence
    Expectancy
    Seniority
    Performance assessment
    Organizational performance
    Fairness
    Design methodology
    Performance management systems

    Keywords

    • 360-degree feedback
    • Behaviour
    • Influence
    • Interpersonal relations
    • Training
    • Workplace

    Cite this

    Manning, Tony ; Pogson, Graham ; Morrison, Zoe. / Interpersonal influence in the workplace : Influencing behaviour and 360-degree assessments. In: Industrial and Commercial Training. 2009 ; Vol. 41, No. 5. pp. 258-269.
    @article{0907ebdac373449cb09caf00c7a5e79d,
    title = "Interpersonal influence in the workplace: Influencing behaviour and 360-degree assessments",
    abstract = "Purpose - The paper aims to present and discuss research into the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact, including gender and seniority differences. Design/methodology/approach - The paper builds on previous articles considering influencing behaviour in the workplace. These articles present a model of interpersonal influence and describe how individual influencing behaviour varies in different contexts. They identified the need for further investigation into the effectiveness of such behaviours in those contexts. This research utilises 360-degree performance assessments as an indicator of the {"}effectiveness{"} or impact of workplace influencing behaviours. Findings - The findings extend previous work supporting the idea that there are few, if any, influencing behaviours that apply to all situations and highlight the role of expectancies in work place assessments of influencing behaviours. Research limitations/implications - The research highlights ways in which the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact differ according to both the gender and seniority of those seeking to influence. This indicates that the {"}expectancies{"} of the influence or target affect perceptions of influencing behaviour and assessments of impact. This is consistent with the model of interpersonal influence previously developed, which includes explicit reference to feedback loops between behaviour, responses and expectancies. This raises further questions as to the impact of expectancies on 360-degree assessment, and the nature and fairness of assessment within organisational performance management systems.Originality/value - This paper challenges the idea that there are influencing strategies and styles that are effective, irrespective of context. It also highlights the role of expectancies within behavioural assessments in the workplace. {\circledC} Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
    keywords = "360-degree feedback, Behaviour, Influence, Interpersonal relations, Training, Workplace",
    author = "Tony Manning and Graham Pogson and Zoe Morrison",
    year = "2009",
    month = "7",
    day = "10",
    doi = "10.1108/00197850910974802",
    language = "English",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "258--269",
    journal = "Industrial and Commercial Training",
    issn = "0019-7858",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "5",

    }

    Interpersonal influence in the workplace : Influencing behaviour and 360-degree assessments. / Manning, Tony; Pogson, Graham; Morrison, Zoe.

    In: Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 41, No. 5, 10.07.2009, p. 258-269.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Interpersonal influence in the workplace

    T2 - Influencing behaviour and 360-degree assessments

    AU - Manning, Tony

    AU - Pogson, Graham

    AU - Morrison, Zoe

    PY - 2009/7/10

    Y1 - 2009/7/10

    N2 - Purpose - The paper aims to present and discuss research into the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact, including gender and seniority differences. Design/methodology/approach - The paper builds on previous articles considering influencing behaviour in the workplace. These articles present a model of interpersonal influence and describe how individual influencing behaviour varies in different contexts. They identified the need for further investigation into the effectiveness of such behaviours in those contexts. This research utilises 360-degree performance assessments as an indicator of the "effectiveness" or impact of workplace influencing behaviours. Findings - The findings extend previous work supporting the idea that there are few, if any, influencing behaviours that apply to all situations and highlight the role of expectancies in work place assessments of influencing behaviours. Research limitations/implications - The research highlights ways in which the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact differ according to both the gender and seniority of those seeking to influence. This indicates that the "expectancies" of the influence or target affect perceptions of influencing behaviour and assessments of impact. This is consistent with the model of interpersonal influence previously developed, which includes explicit reference to feedback loops between behaviour, responses and expectancies. This raises further questions as to the impact of expectancies on 360-degree assessment, and the nature and fairness of assessment within organisational performance management systems.Originality/value - This paper challenges the idea that there are influencing strategies and styles that are effective, irrespective of context. It also highlights the role of expectancies within behavioural assessments in the workplace. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    AB - Purpose - The paper aims to present and discuss research into the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact, including gender and seniority differences. Design/methodology/approach - The paper builds on previous articles considering influencing behaviour in the workplace. These articles present a model of interpersonal influence and describe how individual influencing behaviour varies in different contexts. They identified the need for further investigation into the effectiveness of such behaviours in those contexts. This research utilises 360-degree performance assessments as an indicator of the "effectiveness" or impact of workplace influencing behaviours. Findings - The findings extend previous work supporting the idea that there are few, if any, influencing behaviours that apply to all situations and highlight the role of expectancies in work place assessments of influencing behaviours. Research limitations/implications - The research highlights ways in which the relationship between influencing behaviour and impact differ according to both the gender and seniority of those seeking to influence. This indicates that the "expectancies" of the influence or target affect perceptions of influencing behaviour and assessments of impact. This is consistent with the model of interpersonal influence previously developed, which includes explicit reference to feedback loops between behaviour, responses and expectancies. This raises further questions as to the impact of expectancies on 360-degree assessment, and the nature and fairness of assessment within organisational performance management systems.Originality/value - This paper challenges the idea that there are influencing strategies and styles that are effective, irrespective of context. It also highlights the role of expectancies within behavioural assessments in the workplace. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    KW - 360-degree feedback

    KW - Behaviour

    KW - Influence

    KW - Interpersonal relations

    KW - Training

    KW - Workplace

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349651000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/00197850910974802

    DO - 10.1108/00197850910974802

    M3 - Article

    VL - 41

    SP - 258

    EP - 269

    JO - Industrial and Commercial Training

    JF - Industrial and Commercial Training

    SN - 0019-7858

    IS - 5

    ER -