Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intergenerational cross-subsidies in UK Collective Defined Contribution funds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We evaluate the performance and level of intergenerational cross-subsidy in flat-accrual and dynamic-accrual collective defined contribution (CDC) schemes, which have been designed to be compatible with UK legislation. In the flat-accrual scheme, all members accrue the benefits at the same rate, irrespective of age. This captures the most significant feature of the Royal Mail Collective Pension Plan, which is currently the only UK CDC scheme. The dynamic-accrual schemes seek to reduce intergenerational cross-subsidies by varying the rate of benefit-accrual schemes in accordance with the age of members and the current funding level. We find that these CDC schemes can often be successful in smoothing pension outcomes postretirement while outperforming a defined contribution scheme followed by annuity purchase at the point of retirement. However, this out-performance is not guaranteed in a flat-accrual scheme, and there is little smoothing of projected pension outcomes before retirement. There are significant intergenerational cross-subsidies in the flat-accrual scheme, which qualitatively mirror the cross-subsidies seen in defined benefit schemes, but the magnitude of cross-subsidies is much larger in flat-accrual CDC schemes. The dynamic-accrual scheme design seeks to reduce such cross-subsidies, but we find significant cross-subsidies still arise due to the approximate pricing methodology used to determine the benefits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-413
Number of pages33
JournalAnnals of Actuarial Science
Volume20
Issue number2
Early online date25 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2026

Keywords

  • CDC
  • Collective defined contribution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intergenerational cross-subsidies in UK Collective Defined Contribution funds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this