Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence

Lewis J. Bartlett, Carly Rozins, Berry J. Brosi, Keith S. Delaphane, Jacobus C. de Roode, Andrew White, Lena Wlifert, Michael Boots

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

1) It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi-colony models to inform how ‘apicultural intensification’ is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale.

2) We used both agent-based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure, and increased between-colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low-intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.

3) The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and therefore the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.

4) Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2195-2205
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume56
Issue number9
Early online date16 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

disease prevalence
honeybee
bee
pathogen
apiculture
agricultural management
epidemiology
farming system
population size
management practice
modeling

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • apiculture
  • beekeeping
  • disease prevalence
  • infectious disease
  • intensification
  • mathematical model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Bartlett, L. J., Rozins, C., Brosi, B. J., Delaphane, K. S., de Roode, J. C., White, A., ... Boots, M. (2019). Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(9), 2195-2205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13461
Bartlett, Lewis J. ; Rozins, Carly ; Brosi, Berry J. ; Delaphane, Keith S. ; de Roode, Jacobus C. ; White, Andrew ; Wlifert, Lena ; Boots, Michael. / Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2019 ; Vol. 56, No. 9. pp. 2195-2205.
@article{e455c457aacc4c07ad4a07d8546fed72,
title = "Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence",
abstract = "1) It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi-colony models to inform how ‘apicultural intensification’ is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale. 2) We used both agent-based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure, and increased between-colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low-intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.3) The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and therefore the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.4) Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.",
keywords = "agriculture, apiculture, beekeeping, disease prevalence, infectious disease, intensification, mathematical model",
author = "Bartlett, {Lewis J.} and Carly Rozins and Brosi, {Berry J.} and Delaphane, {Keith S.} and {de Roode}, {Jacobus C.} and Andrew White and Lena Wlifert and Michael Boots",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13461",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "2195--2205",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

Bartlett, LJ, Rozins, C, Brosi, BJ, Delaphane, KS, de Roode, JC, White, A, Wlifert, L & Boots, M 2019, 'Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2195-2205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13461

Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence. / Bartlett, Lewis J.; Rozins, Carly ; Brosi, Berry J.; Delaphane, Keith S.; de Roode, Jacobus C.; White, Andrew; Wlifert, Lena; Boots, Michael.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 56, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 2195-2205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence

AU - Bartlett, Lewis J.

AU - Rozins, Carly

AU - Brosi, Berry J.

AU - Delaphane, Keith S.

AU - de Roode, Jacobus C.

AU - White, Andrew

AU - Wlifert, Lena

AU - Boots, Michael

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - 1) It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi-colony models to inform how ‘apicultural intensification’ is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale. 2) We used both agent-based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure, and increased between-colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low-intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.3) The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and therefore the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.4) Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.

AB - 1) It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi-colony models to inform how ‘apicultural intensification’ is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale. 2) We used both agent-based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure, and increased between-colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low-intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.3) The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and therefore the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.4) Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.

KW - agriculture

KW - apiculture

KW - beekeeping

KW - disease prevalence

KW - infectious disease

KW - intensification

KW - mathematical model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069816032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13461

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13461

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 2195

EP - 2205

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 9

ER -