In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise

David May; A. Aktas; S. G. Advani; D. C. Berg; A. Endruweit; E. Fauster; S. V. Lomov; A. C. Long; P. Mitschang; Sergey G.  Abaimov; D. Abliz; I. Akhatov; Ali Anttho; T. D. Allen; S. Bickerton; M. Bodaghi; B. Caglar; H. Caglar; A. Chiminelli; N. Correia; B. Cosson; M. Danzi; J. Dittmann; Paolo A. Ermanni; G. Francucci; A. George; V. Grishaev; M. Hancioglu; M. A. Kabachi; K. Kind; M. Deléglise-Lagardère; M. Laspalas; O. V. Lebedev; M. Lizaranzu; P. -J. Liotier; P. Middendorf; J. Morán; C. -H.  Park; R. B. Pipes; M. F. Pucci; J. Raynal; E. S. Rodriguez; R. Schledjewski; R. Schubnel; N. Sharp; G. Sims; E. M. Sozer; P. Sousa; Rehan Umer; W. Wijaya; B. Willenbacher; A. Yong; S. Zaremba; G. Ziegmann; International Benchmark Excercise

doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006

In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise

David May^*, A. Aktas, S. G. Advani, D. C. Berg, A. Endruweit, E. Fauster, S. V. Lomov, A. C. Long, P. Mitschang, Sergey G. Abaimov, D. Abliz, I. Akhatov, Ali Anttho, T. D. Allen, S. Bickerton, M. Bodaghi, B. Caglar, H. Caglar, A. Chiminelli, N. CorreiaB. Cosson, M. Danzi, J. Dittmann, Paolo A. Ermanni, G. Francucci, A. George, V. Grishaev, M. Hancioglu, M. A. Kabachi, K. Kind, M. Deléglise-Lagardère, M. Laspalas, O. V. Lebedev, M. Lizaranzu, P. -J. Liotier, P. Middendorf, J. Morán, C. -H. Park, R. B. Pipes, M. F. Pucci, J. Raynal, E. S. Rodriguez, R. Schledjewski, R. Schubnel, N. Sharp, G. Sims, E. M. Sozer, P. Sousa, Rehan Umer, W. Wijaya, B. Willenbacher, A. Yong, S. Zaremba, G. Ziegmann, International Benchmark Excercise

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although good progress was made by two international benchmark exercises on in-plane permeability, existing methods have not yet been standardized. This paper presents the results of a third benchmark exercise using in-plane permeability measurement, based on systems applying the radial unsaturated injection method. 19 participants using 20 systems characterized a non-crimp and a woven fabric at three different fiber volume contents, using a commercially available silicone oil as impregnating fluid. They followed a detailed characterization procedure and also completed a questionnaire on their set-up and analysis methods. Excluding outliers (2 of 20), the average coefficient of variation (cv) between the participant’s results was 32% and 44% (non-crimp and woven fabric), while the average cv for individual participants was 8% and 12%, respectively. This indicates statistically significant variations between the measurement systems. Cavity deformation was identified as a major influence, besides fluid pressure/viscosity measurement, textile variations, and data analysis.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	100-114
Number of pages	15
Journal	Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing
Volume	121
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006
Publication status	Published - Jun 2019

Keywords

A. Fabrics/textiles
B. Permeability
D. Process monitoring
E. Liquid composite molding
E. Resin flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Ceramics and Composites
Mechanics of Materials

Access to Document

10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006

Cite this

May, D., Aktas, A., Advani, S. G., Berg, D. C., Endruweit, A., Fauster, E., Lomov, S. V., Long, A. C., Mitschang, P., Abaimov, S. G., Abliz, D., Akhatov, I., Anttho, A., Allen, T. D., Bickerton, S., Bodaghi, M., Caglar, B., Caglar, H., Chiminelli, A., ... International Benchmark Excercise (2019). In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 121, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006

@article{ea28ec1bdd54499ba0359045e881c1f5,

title = "In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise",

abstract = "Although good progress was made by two international benchmark exercises on in-plane permeability, existing methods have not yet been standardized. This paper presents the results of a third benchmark exercise using in-plane permeability measurement, based on systems applying the radial unsaturated injection method. 19 participants using 20 systems characterized a non-crimp and a woven fabric at three different fiber volume contents, using a commercially available silicone oil as impregnating fluid. They followed a detailed characterization procedure and also completed a questionnaire on their set-up and analysis methods. Excluding outliers (2 of 20), the average coefficient of variation (cv) between the participant{\textquoteright}s results was 32% and 44% (non-crimp and woven fabric), while the average cv for individual participants was 8% and 12%, respectively. This indicates statistically significant variations between the measurement systems. Cavity deformation was identified as a major influence, besides fluid pressure/viscosity measurement, textile variations, and data analysis.",

keywords = "A. Fabrics/textiles, B. Permeability, D. Process monitoring, E. Liquid composite molding, E. Resin flow",

author = "David May and A. Aktas and Advani, {S. G.} and Berg, {D. C.} and A. Endruweit and E. Fauster and Lomov, {S. V.} and Long, {A. C.} and P. Mitschang and Abaimov, {Sergey G.} and D. Abliz and I. Akhatov and Ali Anttho and Allen, {T. D.} and S. Bickerton and M. Bodaghi and B. Caglar and H. Caglar and A. Chiminelli and N. Correia and B. Cosson and M. Danzi and J. Dittmann and Ermanni, {Paolo A.} and G. Francucci and A. George and V. Grishaev and M. Hancioglu and Kabachi, {M. A.} and K. Kind and M. Del{\'e}glise-Lagard{\`e}re and M. Laspalas and Lebedev, {O. V.} and M. Lizaranzu and Liotier, {P. -J.} and P. Middendorf and J. Mor{\'a}n and Park, {C. -H.} and Pipes, {R. B.} and Pucci, {M. F.} and J. Raynal and Rodriguez, {E. S.} and R. Schledjewski and R. Schubnel and N. Sharp and G. Sims and Sozer, {E. M.} and P. Sousa and Rehan Umer and W. Wijaya and B. Willenbacher and A. Yong and S. Zaremba and G. Ziegmann and {International Benchmark Excercise}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2019",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006",

language = "English",

volume = "121",

pages = "100--114",

journal = "Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing",

issn = "1359-835X",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

May, D, Aktas, A, Advani, SG, Berg, DC, Endruweit, A, Fauster, E, Lomov, SV, Long, AC, Mitschang, P, Abaimov, SG, Abliz, D, Akhatov, I, Anttho, A, Allen, TD, Bickerton, S, Bodaghi, M, Caglar, B, Caglar, H, Chiminelli, A, Correia, N, Cosson, B, Danzi, M, Dittmann, J, Ermanni, PA, Francucci, G, George, A, Grishaev, V, Hancioglu, M, Kabachi, MA, Kind, K, Deléglise-Lagardère, M, Laspalas, M, Lebedev, OV, Lizaranzu, M, Liotier, P-J, Middendorf, P, Morán, J, Park, C-H, Pipes, RB, Pucci, MF, Raynal, J, Rodriguez, ES, Schledjewski, R, Schubnel, R, Sharp, N, Sims, G, Sozer, EM, Sousa, P, Umer, R, Wijaya, W, Willenbacher, B, Yong, A, Zaremba, S, Ziegmann, G & International Benchmark Excercise 2019, 'In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise', Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 121, pp. 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006

TY - JOUR

T1 - In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise

AU - May, David

AU - Aktas, A.

AU - Advani, S. G.

AU - Berg, D. C.

AU - Endruweit, A.

AU - Fauster, E.

AU - Lomov, S. V.

AU - Long, A. C.

AU - Mitschang, P.

AU - Abaimov, Sergey G.

AU - Abliz, D.

AU - Akhatov, I.

AU - Anttho, Ali

AU - Allen, T. D.

AU - Bickerton, S.

AU - Bodaghi, M.

AU - Caglar, B.

AU - Caglar, H.

AU - Chiminelli, A.

AU - Correia, N.

AU - Cosson, B.

AU - Danzi, M.

AU - Dittmann, J.

AU - Ermanni, Paolo A.

AU - Francucci, G.

AU - George, A.

AU - Grishaev, V.

AU - Hancioglu, M.

AU - Kabachi, M. A.

AU - Kind, K.

AU - Deléglise-Lagardère, M.

AU - Laspalas, M.

AU - Lebedev, O. V.

AU - Lizaranzu, M.

AU - Liotier, P. -J.

AU - Middendorf, P.

AU - Morán, J.

AU - Park, C. -H.

AU - Pipes, R. B.

AU - Pucci, M. F.

AU - Raynal, J.

AU - Rodriguez, E. S.

AU - Schledjewski, R.

AU - Schubnel, R.

AU - Sharp, N.

AU - Sims, G.

AU - Sozer, E. M.

AU - Sousa, P.

AU - Umer, Rehan

AU - Wijaya, W.

AU - Willenbacher, B.

AU - Yong, A.

AU - Zaremba, S.

AU - Ziegmann, G.

AU - International Benchmark Excercise

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Although good progress was made by two international benchmark exercises on in-plane permeability, existing methods have not yet been standardized. This paper presents the results of a third benchmark exercise using in-plane permeability measurement, based on systems applying the radial unsaturated injection method. 19 participants using 20 systems characterized a non-crimp and a woven fabric at three different fiber volume contents, using a commercially available silicone oil as impregnating fluid. They followed a detailed characterization procedure and also completed a questionnaire on their set-up and analysis methods. Excluding outliers (2 of 20), the average coefficient of variation (cv) between the participant’s results was 32% and 44% (non-crimp and woven fabric), while the average cv for individual participants was 8% and 12%, respectively. This indicates statistically significant variations between the measurement systems. Cavity deformation was identified as a major influence, besides fluid pressure/viscosity measurement, textile variations, and data analysis.

AB - Although good progress was made by two international benchmark exercises on in-plane permeability, existing methods have not yet been standardized. This paper presents the results of a third benchmark exercise using in-plane permeability measurement, based on systems applying the radial unsaturated injection method. 19 participants using 20 systems characterized a non-crimp and a woven fabric at three different fiber volume contents, using a commercially available silicone oil as impregnating fluid. They followed a detailed characterization procedure and also completed a questionnaire on their set-up and analysis methods. Excluding outliers (2 of 20), the average coefficient of variation (cv) between the participant’s results was 32% and 44% (non-crimp and woven fabric), while the average cv for individual participants was 8% and 12%, respectively. This indicates statistically significant variations between the measurement systems. Cavity deformation was identified as a major influence, besides fluid pressure/viscosity measurement, textile variations, and data analysis.

KW - A. Fabrics/textiles

KW - B. Permeability

KW - D. Process monitoring

KW - E. Liquid composite molding

KW - E. Resin flow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063045385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063045385

SN - 1359-835X

VL - 121

SP - 100

EP - 114

JO - Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing

JF - Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing

ER -

In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this