Implications of a zoned fishery management system for marine benthic communities

Robert E. Blyth*, Michel J. Kaiser, Gareth Edwards-Jones, Paul J. B. Hart

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)


1. The impacts of trawls and dredges on marine benthic habitats and communities have been studied extensively, but mostly at small scales and over short time periods. To investigate the large-scale chronic impacts of towed fishing gears, zoned commercial fishery management systems allow comparison of habitats and communities between areas of seabed subjected to varying levels of towed-gear use.

2. The Inshore Potting Agreement (IPA) was implemented in 1978 to restrict the use of towed gears in inshore areas that had traditionally been used by static-gear (pot and net) fishers. We used scallop dredges to sample benthic communities at sites within and adjacent to the IPA area that had been subjected to four different commercial fishing regimes since the inception of the system. These were: (i) towed gears only, (ii) annual, seasonal towed-gear use, (iii) temporary towed-gear use but reverting to static-gear use 18-24 months prior to sampling, and (iv) static gears only.

3. There were no significant differences in the total species richness or biomass of benthic communities between sites under regimes (i) and (ii). There was significantly greater total species richness and biomass of benthic communities at sites under regimes (iii) and (iv) than at sites under regimes (i) and (ii). The benthic community biomass under regime (iv) was significantly greater than under all other regimes.

4. The IPA has maintained benthic species that are important for the settlement and survival of others. The cessation of towed-gear fishing for a period of greater than 2 years would be necessary for benthic communities in areas adjacent to the IPA to recover such that they were indistinguishable from areas where towed gears had not been used.

5. Synthesis and applications. Members of the fishing industry may object to the creation of permanent closed areas because harvestable stocks can move in space and time. This study indicates that zoned fishery management can allow some sectors of the fishing industry to retain access to fishery resources while protecting benthic species and habitats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)951-961
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2004


  • Community recovery
  • Marine protected area
  • Static gear
  • Trawling effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Implications of a zoned fishery management system for marine benthic communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this