Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations

Simon A. Mathias, Jon G. Gluyas, Ward H. Goldthorpe, Eric James Mackay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Injecting CO2 into deep saline formations represents an important component of many greenhouse gas reduction strategies for the future. A number of authors have posed concern over the thousands of injection wells likely to be needed. However, a more important criterion than the number of wells is whether the total cost of storing the CO2 is market bearable. Previous studies have sought to determine the number of injection wells required to achieve a specified storage target. Here an alternative methodology is presented whereby we specify a maximum allowable cost (MAC) per tonne of CO2 stored, a priori, and determine the corresponding potential operational storage capacity. The methodology takes advantage of an analytical solution for pressure build-up during CO2 injection into a cylindrical saline formation, accounting for two-phase flow, brine evaporation and salt precipitation around the injection well. The methodology is applied to 375 saline formations from the UK Continental Shelf. Parameter uncertainty is propagated using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 realisations for each formation. The results show that MAC affects both the magnitude and spatial distribution of potential operational storage capacity on a national scale. Different storage prospects can appear more or less attractive depending on the MAC scenario considered. It is shown that, under high well injection rate scenarios with relatively low cost, there is adequate operational storage capacity for the equivalent of 40 years of UK CO2 emissions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13510-13518
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume49
Issue number22
Early online date20 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2015

Fingerprint

well
cost
Costs
methodology
two phase flow
Greenhouse gases
Two phase flow
Spatial distribution
brine
continental shelf
Evaporation
greenhouse gas
Salts
evaporation
spatial distribution
salt
market
simulation
parameter
rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Mathias, Simon A. ; Gluyas, Jon G. ; Goldthorpe, Ward H. ; Mackay, Eric James. / Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2015 ; Vol. 49, No. 22. pp. 13510-13518.
@article{08eb7b1169b946828e341a36367193c1,
title = "Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations",
abstract = "Injecting CO2 into deep saline formations represents an important component of many greenhouse gas reduction strategies for the future. A number of authors have posed concern over the thousands of injection wells likely to be needed. However, a more important criterion than the number of wells is whether the total cost of storing the CO2 is market bearable. Previous studies have sought to determine the number of injection wells required to achieve a specified storage target. Here an alternative methodology is presented whereby we specify a maximum allowable cost (MAC) per tonne of CO2 stored, a priori, and determine the corresponding potential operational storage capacity. The methodology takes advantage of an analytical solution for pressure build-up during CO2 injection into a cylindrical saline formation, accounting for two-phase flow, brine evaporation and salt precipitation around the injection well. The methodology is applied to 375 saline formations from the UK Continental Shelf. Parameter uncertainty is propagated using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 realisations for each formation. The results show that MAC affects both the magnitude and spatial distribution of potential operational storage capacity on a national scale. Different storage prospects can appear more or less attractive depending on the MAC scenario considered. It is shown that, under high well injection rate scenarios with relatively low cost, there is adequate operational storage capacity for the equivalent of 40 years of UK CO2 emissions.",
author = "Mathias, {Simon A.} and Gluyas, {Jon G.} and Goldthorpe, {Ward H.} and Mackay, {Eric James}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.5b02836",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "13510--13518",
journal = "Environmental Science and Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "22",

}

Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations. / Mathias, Simon A.; Gluyas, Jon G.; Goldthorpe, Ward H.; Mackay, Eric James.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 49, No. 22, 17.11.2015, p. 13510-13518.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations

AU - Mathias, Simon A.

AU - Gluyas, Jon G.

AU - Goldthorpe, Ward H.

AU - Mackay, Eric James

PY - 2015/11/17

Y1 - 2015/11/17

N2 - Injecting CO2 into deep saline formations represents an important component of many greenhouse gas reduction strategies for the future. A number of authors have posed concern over the thousands of injection wells likely to be needed. However, a more important criterion than the number of wells is whether the total cost of storing the CO2 is market bearable. Previous studies have sought to determine the number of injection wells required to achieve a specified storage target. Here an alternative methodology is presented whereby we specify a maximum allowable cost (MAC) per tonne of CO2 stored, a priori, and determine the corresponding potential operational storage capacity. The methodology takes advantage of an analytical solution for pressure build-up during CO2 injection into a cylindrical saline formation, accounting for two-phase flow, brine evaporation and salt precipitation around the injection well. The methodology is applied to 375 saline formations from the UK Continental Shelf. Parameter uncertainty is propagated using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 realisations for each formation. The results show that MAC affects both the magnitude and spatial distribution of potential operational storage capacity on a national scale. Different storage prospects can appear more or less attractive depending on the MAC scenario considered. It is shown that, under high well injection rate scenarios with relatively low cost, there is adequate operational storage capacity for the equivalent of 40 years of UK CO2 emissions.

AB - Injecting CO2 into deep saline formations represents an important component of many greenhouse gas reduction strategies for the future. A number of authors have posed concern over the thousands of injection wells likely to be needed. However, a more important criterion than the number of wells is whether the total cost of storing the CO2 is market bearable. Previous studies have sought to determine the number of injection wells required to achieve a specified storage target. Here an alternative methodology is presented whereby we specify a maximum allowable cost (MAC) per tonne of CO2 stored, a priori, and determine the corresponding potential operational storage capacity. The methodology takes advantage of an analytical solution for pressure build-up during CO2 injection into a cylindrical saline formation, accounting for two-phase flow, brine evaporation and salt precipitation around the injection well. The methodology is applied to 375 saline formations from the UK Continental Shelf. Parameter uncertainty is propagated using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 realisations for each formation. The results show that MAC affects both the magnitude and spatial distribution of potential operational storage capacity on a national scale. Different storage prospects can appear more or less attractive depending on the MAC scenario considered. It is shown that, under high well injection rate scenarios with relatively low cost, there is adequate operational storage capacity for the equivalent of 40 years of UK CO2 emissions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947216292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.5b02836

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.5b02836

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 13510

EP - 13518

JO - Environmental Science and Technology

JF - Environmental Science and Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 22

ER -