TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of k4b2 calibration drift on respiratory measurements during walking and running
AU - Easton, Chris
AU - Howe, Christopher C. F.
AU - Matzko, Richard O.
AU - Piaser, Fabio
AU - Pitsiladis, Yannis P.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - The K4b2 (COSMED s.r.l, Rome, Italy) is a
portable metabolic analyser designed to measure breath-by-breath respiratory
variables in the field. While the majority of published evidence suggests that
the K4b2 is valid and reliable during rest and exercise, it has
been previously demonstrated that the accuracy of the %O2 and
%CO2 measurements can drift over time (McLaughlin et al.
2001. Int J Sports Med 22(4): 280-284). However, the effect of
K4b2 calibration drift on respiratory variables during
prolonged exercise tests is presently unclear.
PURPOSE: To examine the accuracy of K4b2 measurements
of VO2, VCO2 and VE following a one
hour delay between calibration and measurement.
METHODS: Ten male participants (age: 31 ± 11 years,
height: 181 ± 3 cm and body mass: 84.1 ± 10.0 kg) completed three maximal
discontinuous incremental exercise tests on a motorized treadmill at speeds
corresponding to 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 km·hr-1, or until
volitional exhaustion. Participants completed 3 min of exercise at each speed,
followed by 3 min active recovery for all speeds above 10 km·hr-1.
Respiratory variables were measured continuously using either a laboratory
based metabolic cart (Oxycon Pro, Carefusion, Germany) (OP), a K4b2 calibrated
immediately before use (K4b2) or a K4b2 calibrated
one hour prior to the test (K4b2DEL).
RESULTS: VCO2 and VE were
not different when measured by K4b2 (P=0.27, P=0.53
respectively) or K4b2DEL (P=0.14, P=0.39
respectively) compared to the OP. VO2 was not different between
OP and K4b2 (P=0.19) but K4b2DEL
overestimated VO2 compared to the OP at faster running speeds (P=0.05).
Bland and Altman analysis indicated good agreement in the measurement of VO2 between
OP and K4b2 with a mean difference of 38 ml·min-1 and
limits of agreement between -285 and 208 ml·min-1. The mean
difference between K4b2DEL and OP was 84 ml·min-1 with
limits of agreement between -469 and 302 ml·min-1.
CONCLUSIONS: The K4b2 overestimated VO2 during
faster running speeds following a one hour delay between calibration and
measurement. Whilst care should be taken when using this device for longer
duration exercise tests, the extent of the differences were small and newer
models of the K4b2 are fitted with a periodical recalibration
mechanism which may eliminate this issue.
AB - The K4b2 (COSMED s.r.l, Rome, Italy) is a
portable metabolic analyser designed to measure breath-by-breath respiratory
variables in the field. While the majority of published evidence suggests that
the K4b2 is valid and reliable during rest and exercise, it has
been previously demonstrated that the accuracy of the %O2 and
%CO2 measurements can drift over time (McLaughlin et al.
2001. Int J Sports Med 22(4): 280-284). However, the effect of
K4b2 calibration drift on respiratory variables during
prolonged exercise tests is presently unclear.
PURPOSE: To examine the accuracy of K4b2 measurements
of VO2, VCO2 and VE following a one
hour delay between calibration and measurement.
METHODS: Ten male participants (age: 31 ± 11 years,
height: 181 ± 3 cm and body mass: 84.1 ± 10.0 kg) completed three maximal
discontinuous incremental exercise tests on a motorized treadmill at speeds
corresponding to 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 km·hr-1, or until
volitional exhaustion. Participants completed 3 min of exercise at each speed,
followed by 3 min active recovery for all speeds above 10 km·hr-1.
Respiratory variables were measured continuously using either a laboratory
based metabolic cart (Oxycon Pro, Carefusion, Germany) (OP), a K4b2 calibrated
immediately before use (K4b2) or a K4b2 calibrated
one hour prior to the test (K4b2DEL).
RESULTS: VCO2 and VE were
not different when measured by K4b2 (P=0.27, P=0.53
respectively) or K4b2DEL (P=0.14, P=0.39
respectively) compared to the OP. VO2 was not different between
OP and K4b2 (P=0.19) but K4b2DEL
overestimated VO2 compared to the OP at faster running speeds (P=0.05).
Bland and Altman analysis indicated good agreement in the measurement of VO2 between
OP and K4b2 with a mean difference of 38 ml·min-1 and
limits of agreement between -285 and 208 ml·min-1. The mean
difference between K4b2DEL and OP was 84 ml·min-1 with
limits of agreement between -469 and 302 ml·min-1.
CONCLUSIONS: The K4b2 overestimated VO2 during
faster running speeds following a one hour delay between calibration and
measurement. Whilst care should be taken when using this device for longer
duration exercise tests, the extent of the differences were small and newer
models of the K4b2 are fitted with a periodical recalibration
mechanism which may eliminate this issue.
U2 - 10.1249/01.mss.0000417529.22755.ed
DO - 10.1249/01.mss.0000417529.22755.ed
M3 - Meeting abstract
SN - 0195-9131
VL - 44
SP - 612
JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
IS - 5S
ER -