How reproducible should research software be?

Sam Harrison; Abhishek  Dasgupta; Simon Waldman; Alex Henderson; Christopher Lovell

doi:10.5281/zenodo.4761867

How reproducible should research software be?

Sam Harrison^*, Abhishek Dasgupta, Simon Waldman, Alex Henderson, Christopher Lovell

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

In this article, we attempt to answer this question by defining four levels of reproducibility, suggesting criteria to help you decide which level your research software should be at, and recommended practices to reach these levels of reproducibility.

Original language	English
Media of output	Online
Publisher	Zenodo
Number of pages	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4761867
Publication status	Published - 14 May 2021

Access to Document

10.5281/zenodo.4761867Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@misc{ba7eb8839a054de880c27e8ac09816db,

title = "How reproducible should research software be?",

abstract = "In this article, we attempt to answer this question by defining four levels of reproducibility, suggesting criteria to help you decide which level your research software should be at, and recommended practices to reach these levels of reproducibility.",

author = "Sam Harrison and Abhishek Dasgupta and Simon Waldman and Alex Henderson and Christopher Lovell",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "14",

doi = "10.5281/zenodo.4761867",

language = "English",