How neighbourhood social mix shapes access to resources from social networks and from services

Nick Bailey, Kirsten Besemer, Glen Bramley, Mark Livingston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social mix policies have become controversial. Claims about the harms caused by neighbourhood effects have been challenged while counter-claims have been made about the potential benefits for low-income households from living in poor communities. This paper examines two aspects of this debate: whether deprived communities provide greater access to social networks and hence resources in the form of gifts, and whether they provide worse access to resources in the form of services. Data come from the largest survey of poverty ever conducted in the UK—the Poverty and Social Exclusion UK Survey 2012. Results do not support either position in the debate. They do not suggest that access to services is worse in deprived neighbourhoods for all services, but only for a minority. While people in deprived neighbourhoods report marginally greater contact with family and slightly higher levels of social support, there is no evidence of greater levels of exchange of gifts or reciprocity through social networks.

LanguageEnglish
Pages295-314
JournalHousing Studies
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online date23 Feb 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

social network
gift
resources
poverty
reciprocity
community
social support
low income
exclusion
minority
contact
evidence

Keywords

  • neighbourhood effects
  • poverty
  • private services
  • public services
  • Social mix
  • social network

Cite this

Bailey, Nick ; Besemer, Kirsten ; Bramley, Glen ; Livingston, Mark. / How neighbourhood social mix shapes access to resources from social networks and from services. In: Housing Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 295-314.
@article{7a628b2b65094580b7cf10c7fbcf207a,
title = "How neighbourhood social mix shapes access to resources from social networks and from services",
abstract = "Social mix policies have become controversial. Claims about the harms caused by neighbourhood effects have been challenged while counter-claims have been made about the potential benefits for low-income households from living in poor communities. This paper examines two aspects of this debate: whether deprived communities provide greater access to social networks and hence resources in the form of gifts, and whether they provide worse access to resources in the form of services. Data come from the largest survey of poverty ever conducted in the UK—the Poverty and Social Exclusion UK Survey 2012. Results do not support either position in the debate. They do not suggest that access to services is worse in deprived neighbourhoods for all services, but only for a minority. While people in deprived neighbourhoods report marginally greater contact with family and slightly higher levels of social support, there is no evidence of greater levels of exchange of gifts or reciprocity through social networks.",
keywords = "neighbourhood effects, poverty, private services, public services, Social mix, social network",
author = "Nick Bailey and Kirsten Besemer and Glen Bramley and Mark Livingston",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/02673037.2014.1000834",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "295--314",
journal = "Housing Studies",
issn = "0267-3037",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

How neighbourhood social mix shapes access to resources from social networks and from services. / Bailey, Nick; Besemer, Kirsten; Bramley, Glen; Livingston, Mark.

In: Housing Studies, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2015, p. 295-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How neighbourhood social mix shapes access to resources from social networks and from services

AU - Bailey, Nick

AU - Besemer, Kirsten

AU - Bramley, Glen

AU - Livingston, Mark

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Social mix policies have become controversial. Claims about the harms caused by neighbourhood effects have been challenged while counter-claims have been made about the potential benefits for low-income households from living in poor communities. This paper examines two aspects of this debate: whether deprived communities provide greater access to social networks and hence resources in the form of gifts, and whether they provide worse access to resources in the form of services. Data come from the largest survey of poverty ever conducted in the UK—the Poverty and Social Exclusion UK Survey 2012. Results do not support either position in the debate. They do not suggest that access to services is worse in deprived neighbourhoods for all services, but only for a minority. While people in deprived neighbourhoods report marginally greater contact with family and slightly higher levels of social support, there is no evidence of greater levels of exchange of gifts or reciprocity through social networks.

AB - Social mix policies have become controversial. Claims about the harms caused by neighbourhood effects have been challenged while counter-claims have been made about the potential benefits for low-income households from living in poor communities. This paper examines two aspects of this debate: whether deprived communities provide greater access to social networks and hence resources in the form of gifts, and whether they provide worse access to resources in the form of services. Data come from the largest survey of poverty ever conducted in the UK—the Poverty and Social Exclusion UK Survey 2012. Results do not support either position in the debate. They do not suggest that access to services is worse in deprived neighbourhoods for all services, but only for a minority. While people in deprived neighbourhoods report marginally greater contact with family and slightly higher levels of social support, there is no evidence of greater levels of exchange of gifts or reciprocity through social networks.

KW - neighbourhood effects

KW - poverty

KW - private services

KW - public services

KW - Social mix

KW - social network

U2 - 10.1080/02673037.2014.1000834

DO - 10.1080/02673037.2014.1000834

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 295

EP - 314

JO - Housing Studies

T2 - Housing Studies

JF - Housing Studies

SN - 0267-3037

IS - 2

ER -