How mental health establishes ‘vulnerability’ as the basis for support from a housing helpline: Self-descriptions and diagnostic categories

Marc Alexander, Derek Edwards, Elizabeth Stokoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the UK, there is a greater prospect of receiving housing support if one is considered ‘vulnerable’ - that is, at unusual risk. However, there can be a disparity between applicant and provider in whether the applicant is indeed vulnerable. We investigate how one particular criterion, mental health, is constructed to reach the required threshold of ‘vulnerability’. On the one hand, callers brought up their mental health either a) before articulating their reason for calling, or b) to strengthen their entitlement to support. Call-takers, however, asked about callers’ mental health a) as part of routine questioning, or b) as subsequently occasioned queries. Our findings show that, and how, mental health and ‘vulnerability’ formulations are produced, organised, and negotiated at the interactional (and institutional) boundaries of subjective experience and formal medical diagnosis, and in ways that afford or constrain the assistance offered. Data are in British English.
Original languageEnglish
JournalResearch on Language and Social Interaction
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 26 Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How mental health establishes ‘vulnerability’ as the basis for support from a housing helpline: Self-descriptions and diagnostic categories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this