How fast should the night shift rotate? A rejoinder

A. A I Wedderburn

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    Abstract

    The argument for greater use of permanent night shift does not match the three times greater use of rotating three-shift systems in Britain. Studies of industrial production show very slight differences between output on different shifts, unlike laboratory studies, suggesting that it is almost impossible to reproduce the practice, motivation, and real consequences of work in laboratory settings. People who prefer permanent night shift often prefer to avoid management, and few managements welcome this; or have important tasks to perform at home in the day-time. Some studies of adaptation have defined inversion of temperature curves poorly, and most night-workers never completely adapt. Social flexibility, which has been the main attraction of rapidly rotating shifts, can be reproduced on permanent night shifts, but then loses the possibility of adaptation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1447-1451
    Number of pages5
    JournalErgonomics
    Volume35
    Issue number12
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 1992

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How fast should the night shift rotate? A rejoinder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Wedderburn, A. A. I. (1992). How fast should the night shift rotate? A rejoinder. Ergonomics, 35(12), 1447-1451.