How does sampling strategy affect uncertainty estimations?

Demet Erbas, Michael Andrew Christie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Bayesian inversion techniques for assessing reservoir performance uncertainties involve generating multiple reservoir models conditioned to the available field data. This process requires sampling in a high-dimensional parameter space to identify good data-fitting models. Therefore, the robustness of the inversion technique strongly depends on the efficiency of the sampling methods used to generate the reservoir models. In order to improve the robustness, the factors affecting the uncertainty estimations must be identified. This paper aims to investigate the effect of sampling strategies on the prediction uncertainty estimations. A synthetic reservoir model has been studied to compare the uncertainty estimations based on different sampling outcomes obtained using Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Neighbourhood Algorithm (NA). The main differences in the sampling outcomes from GA and NA are the degree of exploration and the number of good data-fitting regions identified in the parameter space. We show that different sampling strategies may result in significantly different uncertainty estimates. We also demonstrate that the predictive capability of the history-matched models can be used as an indicator for the spread of the posterior probability distribution. Copyright © 2007, Institut français du pétrole.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)155-167
    Number of pages13
    JournalOil and Gas Science and Technology
    Volume62
    Issue number2 SPECIAL ISSUE
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    sampling
    genetic algorithm
    history
    prediction
    parameter
    inversion

    Cite this

    Erbas, Demet ; Christie, Michael Andrew. / How does sampling strategy affect uncertainty estimations?. In: Oil and Gas Science and Technology. 2007 ; Vol. 62, No. 2 SPECIAL ISSUE. pp. 155-167.
    @article{72693d7740904ee1b87be251b2678596,
    title = "How does sampling strategy affect uncertainty estimations?",
    abstract = "Bayesian inversion techniques for assessing reservoir performance uncertainties involve generating multiple reservoir models conditioned to the available field data. This process requires sampling in a high-dimensional parameter space to identify good data-fitting models. Therefore, the robustness of the inversion technique strongly depends on the efficiency of the sampling methods used to generate the reservoir models. In order to improve the robustness, the factors affecting the uncertainty estimations must be identified. This paper aims to investigate the effect of sampling strategies on the prediction uncertainty estimations. A synthetic reservoir model has been studied to compare the uncertainty estimations based on different sampling outcomes obtained using Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Neighbourhood Algorithm (NA). The main differences in the sampling outcomes from GA and NA are the degree of exploration and the number of good data-fitting regions identified in the parameter space. We show that different sampling strategies may result in significantly different uncertainty estimates. We also demonstrate that the predictive capability of the history-matched models can be used as an indicator for the spread of the posterior probability distribution. Copyright {\circledC} 2007, Institut fran{\cc}ais du p{\'e}trole.",
    author = "Demet Erbas and Christie, {Michael Andrew}",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.2516/ogst:2007014",
    language = "English",
    volume = "62",
    pages = "155--167",
    journal = "Oil and Gas Science and Technology",
    issn = "1294-4475",
    publisher = "Editions Technip",
    number = "2 SPECIAL ISSUE",

    }

    How does sampling strategy affect uncertainty estimations? / Erbas, Demet; Christie, Michael Andrew.

    In: Oil and Gas Science and Technology, Vol. 62, No. 2 SPECIAL ISSUE, 2007, p. 155-167.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How does sampling strategy affect uncertainty estimations?

    AU - Erbas, Demet

    AU - Christie, Michael Andrew

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Bayesian inversion techniques for assessing reservoir performance uncertainties involve generating multiple reservoir models conditioned to the available field data. This process requires sampling in a high-dimensional parameter space to identify good data-fitting models. Therefore, the robustness of the inversion technique strongly depends on the efficiency of the sampling methods used to generate the reservoir models. In order to improve the robustness, the factors affecting the uncertainty estimations must be identified. This paper aims to investigate the effect of sampling strategies on the prediction uncertainty estimations. A synthetic reservoir model has been studied to compare the uncertainty estimations based on different sampling outcomes obtained using Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Neighbourhood Algorithm (NA). The main differences in the sampling outcomes from GA and NA are the degree of exploration and the number of good data-fitting regions identified in the parameter space. We show that different sampling strategies may result in significantly different uncertainty estimates. We also demonstrate that the predictive capability of the history-matched models can be used as an indicator for the spread of the posterior probability distribution. Copyright © 2007, Institut français du pétrole.

    AB - Bayesian inversion techniques for assessing reservoir performance uncertainties involve generating multiple reservoir models conditioned to the available field data. This process requires sampling in a high-dimensional parameter space to identify good data-fitting models. Therefore, the robustness of the inversion technique strongly depends on the efficiency of the sampling methods used to generate the reservoir models. In order to improve the robustness, the factors affecting the uncertainty estimations must be identified. This paper aims to investigate the effect of sampling strategies on the prediction uncertainty estimations. A synthetic reservoir model has been studied to compare the uncertainty estimations based on different sampling outcomes obtained using Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Neighbourhood Algorithm (NA). The main differences in the sampling outcomes from GA and NA are the degree of exploration and the number of good data-fitting regions identified in the parameter space. We show that different sampling strategies may result in significantly different uncertainty estimates. We also demonstrate that the predictive capability of the history-matched models can be used as an indicator for the spread of the posterior probability distribution. Copyright © 2007, Institut français du pétrole.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249278487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.2516/ogst:2007014

    DO - 10.2516/ogst:2007014

    M3 - Article

    VL - 62

    SP - 155

    EP - 167

    JO - Oil and Gas Science and Technology

    JF - Oil and Gas Science and Technology

    SN - 1294-4475

    IS - 2 SPECIAL ISSUE

    ER -