8 Citations (Scopus)
511 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of ‘social control’ interventions in housing and welfare policy often courts intense controversy, and never more so than when attempts are made to bring about change in the conduct of street homeless people. To date, academic scrutiny has focussed on the so-called ‘regulation’ or ‘criminalisation’ of rough sleepers occupying public space, but a range of ‘softer’ control mechanisms are also now in evidence within homelessness support services. This paper explicates the relationship between the distinct forms of social control that have been used in this field – force, coercion, bargaining, influence, and tolerance – and compares the perspectives of policy makers, frontline practitioners and homeless people regarding the appropriateness of their deployment in England. It emphasises that the use of every one of these modes of social control, and indeed the absence of such controls, raises moral and practical dilemmas, the nuance of which is often unacknowledged in academic accounts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1106-1126
Number of pages21
JournalHousing Studies
Volume33
Issue number7
Early online date22 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Homelessness and social control: a typology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this