History matching with time-lapse seismic - will any starting model do?

N. R. Edris, K. D. Stephen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In general our knowledge of the reservoir is insufficient for accurate representation. We generate models that honour well logs, core, 3D seismic etc. but there is inevitably some uncertainty which we try to include in simulatioms via geostatistical modelling. History matching is then based on updating a model to improve the fit to the observed dynamic data. The choice of starting model in the history matching process is therefore critical and we need to know that our parameterisation and updating scheme can convert it into a better representation resembling reality. In this paper we describe how we set up some synthetic test cases to validate the history matching and parameteri scheme. We find that if we use a pilot point separation that is equivalent to the range of the variogram used in generation of permeability distributions, we can get a good representation of the model. Copyright 2008, Society of Petroleum Engineers.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSociety of Petroleum Engineers - 70th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition - Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2008
    Pages1225-1229
    Number of pages5
    Volume2
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    Event70th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition - Rome, Italy
    Duration: 9 Jun 200812 Jun 2008

    Conference

    Conference70th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition
    Abbreviated titleSPE EUROPEC 2008
    Country/TerritoryItaly
    CityRome
    Period9/06/0812/06/08

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'History matching with time-lapse seismic - will any starting model do?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this