Abstract
In this paper, we show that incentives to convert temporary contracts into permanent ones might be less effective when the employment protection legislation associated with temporary contracts is lax. Drawing upon rich administrative data and using a difference-in-differences methodology, we estimate that workers at their first work experience hired on more flexible contracts undergo a reduction in the conversion rate to permanent employment of 6.3 percentage points after the implementation of the incentives (and of 3.2 percentage points over a year), compared to peers hired on more rigid contracts. This reduced conversion rate, which results in a 17% wage penalty even 2 years into their professional journey, points to a significant negative impact of flexible temporary jobs on the future prospects of young workers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1037-1064 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society |
| Volume | 187 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 14 Mar 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- employment protection legislation
- flexibility
- institutional reforms
- temporary contracts
- young workers
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneous paths to stability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver