Harmonising hostel standards: comparing the UK and Poland

Suzanne Fitzpatrick, Julia Wygnańska

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper reviews the progress being made towards harmonising and regulating hostel standards in Europe, employing the UK and Poland as
    illustrative case studies. It argues that a ‘ levelling up ’ harmonisation of ‘ actual ’
    hostel standards appears to be taking place within the UK and Poland, as
    evidenced by general reductions in the scale of hostels, increases in the level
    of support they provide, and some attention being paid to user rights and
    involvement. There are also established ‘ normative ’ physical and management
    standards for hostels in both countries, which are enforced to a greater or lesser extent via legal, administrative and financial mechanisms, albeit that with respect to Poland the emphasis to date has mainly been on self-regulation (a situation that is likely to change in the near future). However, as things stand, it is difficult to envisage a rapid levelling up harmonisation in actual or normative hostel standards between the UK and Poland (or indeed across western and central Europe in general), because of the gap that currently exists with regards to physical conditions in particular. On the other hand, it should be possible to develop transparent EU-wide ‘ benchmarks ’ to allow for consistent comparison in hostel standards within and between countries. The paper contends that such harmonised benchmarks require to be outcome-focussed, and to be fully informed by the perspective of service users.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)41-66
    Number of pages26
    JournalEuropean Journal of Homelessness
    Volume1
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

    Keywords

    • hostels
    • standards
    • harmonisation
    • Regulation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Harmonising hostel standards: comparing the UK and Poland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this