Governmentality, power and organization

Alan McKinlay, Chris Carter, Eric Pezet

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Michel Foucault has moved from being marginal to organization studies to perhaps the most important authority in critical management studies. Yet his methods, historiography and the theoretical value of his work remain obscure, contested or, even worse, simply taken for granted. Governmentality, Foucault’s term for how institutions are imagined, offers a way of understanding how specific forms of knowledge and power emerge, develop and decline. Governmentality brings Foucault very close to Max Weber’s concern with rationalization and the ways that individuals come to govern themselves. Governmentality looks at administrative powers and knowledges that shape our everyday lives. For Foucault, as for Weber, administrative power is not of secondary importance but essential to the ‘successes’ and ‘failures’ of disciplinary institutions and societies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-15
    JournalManagement & Organizational History
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    governmentality
    organization
    rationalization
    historiography
    everyday life
    management
    society

    Cite this

    McKinlay, Alan ; Carter, Chris ; Pezet, Eric. / Governmentality, power and organization. In: Management & Organizational History. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 3-15.
    @article{17a4ddb6cb864fa3904adcff22d79d9a,
    title = "Governmentality, power and organization",
    abstract = "Michel Foucault has moved from being marginal to organization studies to perhaps the most important authority in critical management studies. Yet his methods, historiography and the theoretical value of his work remain obscure, contested or, even worse, simply taken for granted. Governmentality, Foucault’s term for how institutions are imagined, offers a way of understanding how specific forms of knowledge and power emerge, develop and decline. Governmentality brings Foucault very close to Max Weber’s concern with rationalization and the ways that individuals come to govern themselves. Governmentality looks at administrative powers and knowledges that shape our everyday lives. For Foucault, as for Weber, administrative power is not of secondary importance but essential to the ‘successes’ and ‘failures’ of disciplinary institutions and societies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]",
    author = "Alan McKinlay and Chris Carter and Eric Pezet",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1177/1744935911429414",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "3--15",
    journal = "Management & Organizational History",
    issn = "1744-9359",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    Governmentality, power and organization. / McKinlay, Alan; Carter, Chris; Pezet, Eric.

    In: Management & Organizational History, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2012, p. 3-15.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Governmentality, power and organization

    AU - McKinlay, Alan

    AU - Carter, Chris

    AU - Pezet, Eric

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Michel Foucault has moved from being marginal to organization studies to perhaps the most important authority in critical management studies. Yet his methods, historiography and the theoretical value of his work remain obscure, contested or, even worse, simply taken for granted. Governmentality, Foucault’s term for how institutions are imagined, offers a way of understanding how specific forms of knowledge and power emerge, develop and decline. Governmentality brings Foucault very close to Max Weber’s concern with rationalization and the ways that individuals come to govern themselves. Governmentality looks at administrative powers and knowledges that shape our everyday lives. For Foucault, as for Weber, administrative power is not of secondary importance but essential to the ‘successes’ and ‘failures’ of disciplinary institutions and societies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

    AB - Michel Foucault has moved from being marginal to organization studies to perhaps the most important authority in critical management studies. Yet his methods, historiography and the theoretical value of his work remain obscure, contested or, even worse, simply taken for granted. Governmentality, Foucault’s term for how institutions are imagined, offers a way of understanding how specific forms of knowledge and power emerge, develop and decline. Governmentality brings Foucault very close to Max Weber’s concern with rationalization and the ways that individuals come to govern themselves. Governmentality looks at administrative powers and knowledges that shape our everyday lives. For Foucault, as for Weber, administrative power is not of secondary importance but essential to the ‘successes’ and ‘failures’ of disciplinary institutions and societies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

    U2 - 10.1177/1744935911429414

    DO - 10.1177/1744935911429414

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 3

    EP - 15

    JO - Management & Organizational History

    JF - Management & Organizational History

    SN - 1744-9359

    IS - 1

    ER -