Abstract
Goldberg's (2001) IPIP Big-Five personality factor markers currently lack validating evidence. The structure of the 50-item IPIP was examined in three different adult samples (total N = 906), in each case justifying a 5-factor solution, with only minor discrepancies. Age differences were comparable to previous findings using other inventories. One sample (N = 207) also completed two further personality measures (the NEO-FFI and the EPQ-R Short Form). Conscientiousness, Extraversion and Emotional Stability/Neuroticism scales of the IPIP were highly correlated with those of the NEO-FFI (r = 0.69 to -0.83, p <0.01). Agreeableness and Intellect/Openness scales correlated less strongly (r = 0.49 and 0.59 respectively, p <0.01). Correlations between IPIP and EPQ-R Extraversion and Emotional Stability/Neuroticism were high, at 0.85 and -0.84 respectively. The IPIP scales have good internal consistency and relate strongly to major dimensions of personality assessed by two leading questionnaires. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 317-329 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Personality and Individual Differences |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2005 |
Keywords
- LIFE
- IPIP Big-Five factor markers
- validation
- PERSONALITY
- personality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Goldberg's 'IPIP' Big-Five factor markers: internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver