Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: Proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness

John W. Cherrie*, Sean Semple, Derk Brouwer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)


    There are standardized laboratory tests for chemical protective gloves that provide estimates of breakthrough time and steady-state permeation flux. However, there is evidence to suggest that these tests may not be completely relevant to glove usage in the workplace. There is no consensus about how glove workplace effectiveness should be assessed, although a few studies have attempted to measure the effectiveness of chemical protective gloves. We have used a conceptual model of dermal exposure to help analyse how workers' skin may become exposed while wearing gloves, and propose a new glove workplace protection factor (PFgloves), which is based on the ratio of the estimated uptake of chemicals through the hands without gloves to the uptake through the hands while wearing protective gloves. Mathematical simulations demonstrate that glove protection factor is unlikely to be constant for a glove type, but will be strongly influenced by the work situation and the duration of the exposure. This has important consequences for the selection of protective gloves.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)607-615
    Number of pages9
    JournalAnnals of Occupational Hygiene
    Issue number7
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2004


    • Chemical protective gloves
    • Workplace protection factor (WPF)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • General Health Professions


    Dive into the research topics of 'Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: Proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this