From interfaces to infrastructure

extending ecological interface design to re-design rail level crossings

Gemma J. M. Read, Vanessa Beanland, Neville A. Stanton, Eryn Grant, Nicholas Stevens, Michael G. Lenné, Miles Thomas, Christine M. Mulvihill, Guy H. Walker, Paul M. Salmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Collisions between trains and road vehicles at rail level crossings remain an intractable transport safety issue. This paper describes the application of Rasmussen’s ecological interface design (EID) principles to the development of a novel ‘passive’ rail level crossing prototype design and its evaluation using two driving simulator studies. Study 1 involved the design of the prototype EID crossing. Study 2 compared the EID crossing design with a standard ‘active’ rail level crossing with red flashing lights under normal conditions and Study 3 compared the crossings under conditions of driver distraction and technology failure. The findings show that under normal conditions, the EID crossing produced more cautious speed on approach than the standard design, but similar patterns of decision-making. Under conditions of distraction and failure, participants again demonstrated more cautious speed profiles on approach when encountering the EID design. Importantly, in technology failure conditions, the EID design appeared to encourage participants to engage in higher level problem-solving, which was not seen in response to the standard crossing. It is concluded that the EID crossing may be more able to support adaptive decision-making under conditions of failure or uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1–19
Number of pages19
JournalCognition, Technology and Work
Early online date1 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Interface Design
Decision making
Simulators
Decision Making
Prototype
Distraction
Safety
Uncertainty
Simulator
Evaluation
Problem Solving
Roads
Train

Keywords

  • Driving simulation
  • Ecological interface design
  • Highway-rail grade crossings
  • Rail level crossings
  • Transportation safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Read, G. J. M., Beanland, V., Stanton, N. A., Grant, E., Stevens, N., Lenné, M. G., ... Salmon, P. M. (2019). From interfaces to infrastructure: extending ecological interface design to re-design rail level crossings. Cognition, Technology and Work, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00583-2
Read, Gemma J. M. ; Beanland, Vanessa ; Stanton, Neville A. ; Grant, Eryn ; Stevens, Nicholas ; Lenné, Michael G. ; Thomas, Miles ; Mulvihill, Christine M. ; Walker, Guy H. ; Salmon, Paul M. / From interfaces to infrastructure : extending ecological interface design to re-design rail level crossings. In: Cognition, Technology and Work. 2019 ; pp. 1–19.
@article{cd2db964ca154336a99a9fe39d1568e0,
title = "From interfaces to infrastructure: extending ecological interface design to re-design rail level crossings",
abstract = "Collisions between trains and road vehicles at rail level crossings remain an intractable transport safety issue. This paper describes the application of Rasmussen’s ecological interface design (EID) principles to the development of a novel ‘passive’ rail level crossing prototype design and its evaluation using two driving simulator studies. Study 1 involved the design of the prototype EID crossing. Study 2 compared the EID crossing design with a standard ‘active’ rail level crossing with red flashing lights under normal conditions and Study 3 compared the crossings under conditions of driver distraction and technology failure. The findings show that under normal conditions, the EID crossing produced more cautious speed on approach than the standard design, but similar patterns of decision-making. Under conditions of distraction and failure, participants again demonstrated more cautious speed profiles on approach when encountering the EID design. Importantly, in technology failure conditions, the EID design appeared to encourage participants to engage in higher level problem-solving, which was not seen in response to the standard crossing. It is concluded that the EID crossing may be more able to support adaptive decision-making under conditions of failure or uncertainty.",
keywords = "Driving simulation, Ecological interface design, Highway-rail grade crossings, Rail level crossings, Transportation safety",
author = "Read, {Gemma J. M.} and Vanessa Beanland and Stanton, {Neville A.} and Eryn Grant and Nicholas Stevens and Lenn{\'e}, {Michael G.} and Miles Thomas and Mulvihill, {Christine M.} and Walker, {Guy H.} and Salmon, {Paul M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10111-019-00583-2",
language = "English",
pages = "1–19",
journal = "Cognition, Technology and Work",
issn = "1435-5558",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Read, GJM, Beanland, V, Stanton, NA, Grant, E, Stevens, N, Lenné, MG, Thomas, M, Mulvihill, CM, Walker, GH & Salmon, PM 2019, 'From interfaces to infrastructure: extending ecological interface design to re-design rail level crossings', Cognition, Technology and Work, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00583-2

From interfaces to infrastructure : extending ecological interface design to re-design rail level crossings. / Read, Gemma J. M.; Beanland, Vanessa; Stanton, Neville A.; Grant, Eryn; Stevens, Nicholas; Lenné, Michael G.; Thomas, Miles; Mulvihill, Christine M.; Walker, Guy H.; Salmon, Paul M.

In: Cognition, Technology and Work, 01.08.2019, p. 1–19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From interfaces to infrastructure

T2 - extending ecological interface design to re-design rail level crossings

AU - Read, Gemma J. M.

AU - Beanland, Vanessa

AU - Stanton, Neville A.

AU - Grant, Eryn

AU - Stevens, Nicholas

AU - Lenné, Michael G.

AU - Thomas, Miles

AU - Mulvihill, Christine M.

AU - Walker, Guy H.

AU - Salmon, Paul M.

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Collisions between trains and road vehicles at rail level crossings remain an intractable transport safety issue. This paper describes the application of Rasmussen’s ecological interface design (EID) principles to the development of a novel ‘passive’ rail level crossing prototype design and its evaluation using two driving simulator studies. Study 1 involved the design of the prototype EID crossing. Study 2 compared the EID crossing design with a standard ‘active’ rail level crossing with red flashing lights under normal conditions and Study 3 compared the crossings under conditions of driver distraction and technology failure. The findings show that under normal conditions, the EID crossing produced more cautious speed on approach than the standard design, but similar patterns of decision-making. Under conditions of distraction and failure, participants again demonstrated more cautious speed profiles on approach when encountering the EID design. Importantly, in technology failure conditions, the EID design appeared to encourage participants to engage in higher level problem-solving, which was not seen in response to the standard crossing. It is concluded that the EID crossing may be more able to support adaptive decision-making under conditions of failure or uncertainty.

AB - Collisions between trains and road vehicles at rail level crossings remain an intractable transport safety issue. This paper describes the application of Rasmussen’s ecological interface design (EID) principles to the development of a novel ‘passive’ rail level crossing prototype design and its evaluation using two driving simulator studies. Study 1 involved the design of the prototype EID crossing. Study 2 compared the EID crossing design with a standard ‘active’ rail level crossing with red flashing lights under normal conditions and Study 3 compared the crossings under conditions of driver distraction and technology failure. The findings show that under normal conditions, the EID crossing produced more cautious speed on approach than the standard design, but similar patterns of decision-making. Under conditions of distraction and failure, participants again demonstrated more cautious speed profiles on approach when encountering the EID design. Importantly, in technology failure conditions, the EID design appeared to encourage participants to engage in higher level problem-solving, which was not seen in response to the standard crossing. It is concluded that the EID crossing may be more able to support adaptive decision-making under conditions of failure or uncertainty.

KW - Driving simulation

KW - Ecological interface design

KW - Highway-rail grade crossings

KW - Rail level crossings

KW - Transportation safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070077442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10111-019-00583-2

DO - 10.1007/s10111-019-00583-2

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Cognition, Technology and Work

JF - Cognition, Technology and Work

SN - 1435-5558

ER -