Abstract
Commentary articles can go one of two ways. Either they can stick to the orthodoxy; the path well-travelled, and embrace summary rather than synthesis. Or, the issues in play can be seized upon as an opportunity to provoke debate, stress-test ideas, and if fortune really does favour the bold, to send our thinking in new directions. Clearly there is only one option here. In this commentary, I would like to stand back and think about our underlying operating assumptions because these are rarely questioned yet have a profound effect on our methodologies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 452-458 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 17 Nov 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2016 |
Keywords
- epistemology
- methods
- ontology
- Paradigms
- systems thinking
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Human Factors and Ergonomics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fortune favours the bold'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
National Geographic Magazine: The Real Science Inspired By Star Wars
9/12/15
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media: Teaching