Financial crisis and quantitative easing: can broad money tell us anything?

David Cobham, Yue Kang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)


    When the Bank of England (and the Federal Reserve Board) introduced their quantitative easing (QE) operations they emphasised the effects on money and credit, but much of their empirical research on the effects of QE focuses on long-term interest rates. We use a flow of funds matrix with an independent central bank to show the implications of QE and other monetary developments, and argue that the financial crisis, the fiscal expansion and QE are likely to have constituted major exogenous shocks to money and credit which could not be digested immediately by the usual adjustment mechanisms. We present regressions of a reduced form model which considers the growth of nominal spending as determined by the growth of nominal money and other variables. These results suggest that money was not important during the Great Moderation but has had a much larger role in the period of the crisis and QE. We then use these estimates to illustrate the effects of the financial crisis and QE. We conclude that it would be useful to incorporate money and/or credit in wider macroeconometric models of the UK economy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number3
    Pages (from-to)54-76
    Number of pages23
    JournalManchester School
    Issue numberSupplement
    Publication statusPublished - 2012


    • monetary policy
    • quantitative easing
    • financial crisis
    • monetary growth


    Dive into the research topics of 'Financial crisis and quantitative easing: can broad money tell us anything?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this