TY - JOUR
T1 - FarmConners wind farm flow control benchmark - Part 1
T2 - Blind test results
AU - Göçmen, Tuhfe
AU - Campagnolo, Filippo
AU - Duc, Thomas
AU - Eguinoa, Irene
AU - Andersen, Søren Juhl
AU - Petrović, Vlaho
AU - Imširović, Lejla
AU - Braunbehrens, Robert
AU - Liew, Jaime
AU - Baungaard, Mads
AU - van der Laan, Maarten Paul
AU - Qian, Guowei
AU - Aparicio-Sanchez, Maria
AU - González-Lope, Rubén
AU - Dighe, Vinit V.
AU - Becker, Marcus
AU - van den Broek, Maarten J.
AU - van Wingerden, Jan Willem
AU - Stock, Adam
AU - Cole, Matthew
AU - Ruisi, Renzo
AU - Bossanyi, Ervin
AU - Requate, Niklas
AU - Strnad, Simon
AU - Schmidt, Jonas
AU - Vollmer, Lukas
AU - Sood, Ishaan
AU - Meyers, Johan
N1 - Funding Information:
This research has been supported by the Horizon 2020 (FarmConners (grant no. 857844)).
Funding Information:
The wind farm field data used in the benchmark exercise were obtained through the French national project SMARTEOLE, supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-14-CE05-0034).
Funding Information:
The FarmConners benchmark is organized and conducted under the FarmConners project, funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme with grant agreement no. 857844.
Funding Information:
The high-fidelity simulations used in the other two blind tests were produced under the CL-Windcon and TotalControl projects, funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme with grant agreement no. 727477 and grant agreement no. 727680 respectively.
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/9/8
Y1 - 2022/9/8
N2 - Wind farm flow control (WFFC) is a topic of interest at several research institutes and industry and certification agencies worldwide. For reliable performance assessment of the technology, the efficiency and the capability of the models applied to WFFC should be carefully evaluated. To address that, the FarmConners consortium has launched a common benchmark for code comparison under controlled operation to demonstrate its potential benefits, such as increased power production. The benchmark builds on available data sets from previous field campaigns, wind tunnel experiments, and high-fidelity simulations. Within that database, four blind tests are defined and 13 participants in total have submitted results for the analysis of single and multiple wakes under WFFC. Here, we present Part I of the FarmConners benchmark results, focusing on the blind tests with large-scale rotors. The observations and/or the model outcomes are evaluated via direct power comparisons at the upstream and downstream turbine(s), as well as the power gain at the wind farm level under wake steering control strategy. Additionally, wake loss reduction is also analysed to support the power performance comparison, where relevant. The majority of the participating models show good agreement with the observations or the reference high-fidelity simulations, especially for lower degrees of upstream misalignment and narrow wake sector. However, the benchmark clearly highlights the importance of the calibration procedure for control-oriented models. The potential effects of limited controlled operation data in calibration are particularly visible via frequent model mismatch for highly deflected wakes, as well as the power loss at the controlled turbine(s). In addition to the flow modelling, the sensitivity of the predicted WFFC benefits to the turbine representation and the implementation of the controller is also underlined. The FarmConners benchmark is the first of its kind to bring a wide variety of data sets, control settings, and model complexities for the (initial) assessment of farm flow control benefits. It forms an important basis for more detailed benchmarks in the future with extended control objectives to assess the true value of WFFC.
AB - Wind farm flow control (WFFC) is a topic of interest at several research institutes and industry and certification agencies worldwide. For reliable performance assessment of the technology, the efficiency and the capability of the models applied to WFFC should be carefully evaluated. To address that, the FarmConners consortium has launched a common benchmark for code comparison under controlled operation to demonstrate its potential benefits, such as increased power production. The benchmark builds on available data sets from previous field campaigns, wind tunnel experiments, and high-fidelity simulations. Within that database, four blind tests are defined and 13 participants in total have submitted results for the analysis of single and multiple wakes under WFFC. Here, we present Part I of the FarmConners benchmark results, focusing on the blind tests with large-scale rotors. The observations and/or the model outcomes are evaluated via direct power comparisons at the upstream and downstream turbine(s), as well as the power gain at the wind farm level under wake steering control strategy. Additionally, wake loss reduction is also analysed to support the power performance comparison, where relevant. The majority of the participating models show good agreement with the observations or the reference high-fidelity simulations, especially for lower degrees of upstream misalignment and narrow wake sector. However, the benchmark clearly highlights the importance of the calibration procedure for control-oriented models. The potential effects of limited controlled operation data in calibration are particularly visible via frequent model mismatch for highly deflected wakes, as well as the power loss at the controlled turbine(s). In addition to the flow modelling, the sensitivity of the predicted WFFC benefits to the turbine representation and the implementation of the controller is also underlined. The FarmConners benchmark is the first of its kind to bring a wide variety of data sets, control settings, and model complexities for the (initial) assessment of farm flow control benefits. It forms an important basis for more detailed benchmarks in the future with extended control objectives to assess the true value of WFFC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140616479&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022
DO - 10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140616479
SN - 2366-7443
VL - 7
SP - 1791
EP - 1825
JO - Wind Energy Science
JF - Wind Energy Science
IS - 5
ER -