TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the Limits of a LiDAR for an Autonomous Driving Localization
AU - de Paula Veronese, Lucas
AU - Auat-Cheein, Fernando
AU - Mutz, Filipe
AU - Oliveira-Santos, Thiago
AU - Guivant, José E.
AU - De Aguiar, Edilson
AU - Badue, Claudine
AU - de Souza, Alberto Ferreira
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received May 5, 2017; revised September 2, 2018, October 10, 2019, and January 6, 2020; accepted January 23, 2020. Date of publication April 7, 2020; date of current version March 1, 2021. This work was supported in part by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico–CNPq, Brazil, under Grant 12786/2013-1 and Grant 552630/2011-0, in part by the Productivity on Research Scholarship under Grant 311504/2017-5, in part by the Comissão de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal do Nível Superior–CAPES, Brazil–Finance Code 001 under Grant 5557/14-3, in part by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo–FAPES, Brazil, under Grant 594/2018 and Grant 48511579/2009, and in part by the ANID Fondecyt, Chile, under Grant 1201319 and Grant FB0008. The Associate Editor for this article was H. Dia. (Corresponding author: Fernando Auat-Cheein.) Lucas de Paula Veronese is with Visteon Electronics Germany GmbH, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2000-2011 IEEE.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - In general, proposed solutions for LiDAR-based localization used in autonomous cars require expensive sensors and computationally expensive mapping processes. Moreover, the global localization for autonomous driving is converging to the use of maps. Straightforward strategies to reduce the costs are to produce simpler sensors and use maps already available on the Internet. Here, an analysis is presented to show how simple can a LiDAR sensor be without degrading the localization accuracy that uses road and satellite maps together to globally pose the car. Three characteristics of the sensor are evaluated: the number of range readings, the amount of noise in the LiDAR readings, and the frame rate, with the aim of finding the minimum number of LiDAR lines, the maximum acceptable noise and the sensor frame rate needed to obtain an accurate position estimation. The analysis is performed using an autonomous car in complex field scenarios equipped with a 3D LiDAR Velodyne HDL-32E. Several experiments were conducted reducing the number of frames, the number of scans per 3D point-cloud and artificially adding up to 15% of error in the ray length. Among other results, we found that using only 4 vertical lines per scan and with an artificial error added up to 15% of the ray length, the car was capable to localize itself within 2.11 meters error average. All experimental results and the followed methodology are explained in detail herein.
AB - In general, proposed solutions for LiDAR-based localization used in autonomous cars require expensive sensors and computationally expensive mapping processes. Moreover, the global localization for autonomous driving is converging to the use of maps. Straightforward strategies to reduce the costs are to produce simpler sensors and use maps already available on the Internet. Here, an analysis is presented to show how simple can a LiDAR sensor be without degrading the localization accuracy that uses road and satellite maps together to globally pose the car. Three characteristics of the sensor are evaluated: the number of range readings, the amount of noise in the LiDAR readings, and the frame rate, with the aim of finding the minimum number of LiDAR lines, the maximum acceptable noise and the sensor frame rate needed to obtain an accurate position estimation. The analysis is performed using an autonomous car in complex field scenarios equipped with a 3D LiDAR Velodyne HDL-32E. Several experiments were conducted reducing the number of frames, the number of scans per 3D point-cloud and artificially adding up to 15% of error in the ray length. Among other results, we found that using only 4 vertical lines per scan and with an artificial error added up to 15% of the ray length, the car was capable to localize itself within 2.11 meters error average. All experimental results and the followed methodology are explained in detail herein.
KW - Autonomous vehicle
KW - localization
KW - particle filter
KW - sensor fusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083446542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TITS.2020.2971054
DO - 10.1109/TITS.2020.2971054
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083446542
SN - 1524-9050
VL - 22
SP - 1449
EP - 1458
JO - IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
JF - IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
IS - 3
ER -