Abstract
This study sought to validate the Brunel Ethnic Behavior Inventory (BEBI) as a measure of two aspects of “doing” (i.e., ethnic speech and ethnic action) among the “ways of ethnicity” identified by Verkuyten. It also evaluates the construct validity of the BEBI alongside the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure-Revised (MEIM-R) and evaluates the BEBI and the MEIM-R (the latter of which measures exploration as “thinking” and commitment as “feeling” among ways of ethnicity) regarding criterion-related validity. Across two samples (n = 120 for Sample 1 and n = 148 for Sample 2), the BEBI and the MEIM-R performed suitably with regard to construct validity. However, the BEBI arguably performed better with regard to criterion-related validity (i.e., in predicting scores on life satisfaction, flourishing, positive and negative moods, and positive and negative emotions). Implications for validation studies on ways of ethnicity are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 87-101 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Identity |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2016 |
Keywords
- Confirmatory factor analysis
- ego psychology
- ethnic behavior
- ethnic identity
- well-being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anthropology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ethnic Speech and Ethnic Action as Ethnic Behavior: Part 2. Validation of the Brunel Ethnic Behavior Inventory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver